VenusRose is a very worshipful and trance like name, flying with sound and magic for the gallery of oceans to new navigation routes flooding the hyper-spatial doorway with colors galore!!*
VenusRose is a very worshipful and trance like name, flying with sound and magic for the gallery of oceans to new navigation routes flooding the hyper-spatial doorway with colors galore!!*
France and the Spurs 2006-2013 led to Germany winning in 2014 for Bunny and Lugia as Raptor, proven when Leonard won in 2019, and then Zidane won in 2022 to crown Arceus, so ultimately, 2006 led to 2014 and 2022, Zidane's greatest triumph, heavy wisdom and feelings of luster and omnipotence bubbling and zipping incredible trips to universal languages and dinosaurs gambling questions and omega ripples crystallizing Zen
BunnyRaptor was proven to be Lugia at Kobe's 60-point game, synthesizing wonderland toys and cables to book club trading cards holographic shards of eve and winter
Everything was meant to glorify Euro 2000, the Prophecy that Rare Wartortle Wisdom turns a foolish Meganium into a wise Lugia, and 2016 was 1998
When Inter Milan's Wesley Sneijder beat Bayern Munich in Zidane's arena in 2010, this saved the Pokemon World
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...k-2024-edition
6w5 sx/so "Beauty/Strength" archetype
same type
Sx/so: sexual spread into the social; cheery but intense feeling. Spread out, whimsical and shiny energy. More on the so side of sx/so:
Example: Polldark series
Last edited by lkdhf qkb; 08-07-2021 at 12:18 PM.
More on the sx side of sx/so. Completely liberated from any self-preservation.
How sp-first people view sp-lasts and in particular sx/so (it's also a little bit biased bc it's Si vs Se, but it's primarily about instincts)
Idk about instincts stuff but I'm Sx/So and this song sounds like it would fit.
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
Is it an Sx/So thing to constantly talk about who and what you are attracted to?
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
From enneagrammer:
The "theatre of sex" is very interesting. The funny thing about the collages on the enneagrammer site to illustrate Sx/So had a lot of pins (or similar pins) in common. Here are some taken from my own Pinterest boards that I think are good examples of Sx/So.
- singular objects of sexual focus as opposed to SO/SX multiplicity, solipsistic, single cleaves as focal points
- SX but with the conscience of social
- attraction/repulsion response, but more elusive than SX/SP due to the abstract audience of SO
- the theatre of sex
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
I've probably posted this before, but it bears repeating.
Sx-first singing about an sx-last.
Last edited by Averroes; 02-11-2023 at 02:55 PM.
I thinkkkk negative sx/so