I thinkkkk negative sx/so
How accurate are these descriptions? http://oceanmoonshine9.wordpress.com/nine-stacks/ I'm leaning towards sx/so again!
Boardwalk Empire is similar. Another Se and Ni show.
All this Se around you and Ni rolls in. Some people crash on the shores of America like those bottles. Some flow. Some crash. And Nucky is just going with it. Waiting for the answer to roll in.
"And in those days shall men seek death, and shall not find it, and shall desire to die, and death shall flee from them."
@darya just admitted to many things that I won't which is why I can see sx/so for her. I just won't admit to what I relate to in her post to just anybody but some of my friends here know.
I can go from seducer, mystifier, and wanderer sx/sp almost seamlessly, depending on what is going on in my heart, mind and soul. I also take into account that I am a 4w5 so it will manifest differently.
Edit: I can be very guarded and secretive when it comes to my compulsions and attractions.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
@Olly From Wally World
I was thinking about ride or die scenarios... Would you say sx/so for this one? I was wondering if this is sp last. This is inspired by something I read in @suedehead's thread.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
You weren't available on skype for private consultation so FU. Plus I knew it would draw you out.
Future, preach...
Hah! I am thinking sx/so for him but maybe not. He just vibes sx first to me.
Edit: Now that I think about, possibly sx/sp. He has that broody thing going on.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I can't see her as anything but sx/so. I have heard SLE for her too. She is the kind of woman who I would feel intimidated by, just by her presence. She also reminds me of a old friend. I don't think my friend was SLE though. She may be. She likes guns and to blow stuff up... still after all these years. lol
Energetic qualities associated with sx/so: ripping, tearing, destroying, breaking, burning, disapproving, disobeying, dismissing, ridiculing, alienating, crowing, ranting, screaming, displaying, exposing, joining, embodying, asserting, confronting, changing, reinventing, transforming, breaking through, leaving behind, going overboard
fire (sx)+ gas (so) = human blowtorch
+++ in socionics, the revolutionary flame and emotional oversaturation of the Sx/So stacking is often mistaken for Se-valuing; however, it should be noted that this stacking is equally widespread among Si-valuing Alpha and Delta types +++
Last edited by Aylen; 02-02-2015 at 06:04 PM.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Not sure if Otep has been posted yet in this thread. I might have even posted it.
Something about her.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
She is Sx/Sp.
Her lack of a Social instinct shows in the way she used to make trolling videos in the past, and generally had the attitude of not caring about what other people think.
Just watch her music videos on being a "fat chick".
She cares for her audience, sure, but on an Sx/Sp basis.
I'd agree on typing her as Type 3. 3w2, in fact.
P.S: The way she is "obsessed" with relationships and not afraid to make her entire love life public is also Sx/Sp. Not saying all Sx/Sp people are like that (mainly Fe valuing introverts would not be), but one can safely say that a person who is conscious of the Social instinct will keep the details of their love life more private. Making videos on past "sexcapades" as she called them is pretty much Sx/Sp. The Social instinct stays away from such topics, because it is socially unacceptable. Sx/So might "push the buttons" from time to time, but they are aware of doing so. She lacks that awareness.
I disagree with everything. Sx/so is not going for socially acceptable, but for making an impact, an impression on social sphere. Sx/sp is much more private than sx/so. Not saying that sx/sp can't overshare, cause they definitely can, but not in the way this girl is doing.
The videos made me cringe a bit. I hold my "love life" and my feelings about my romantic interests pretty sacred so to do something like this in response to a break up would be totally against my nature. If I talk about it at all, with others, it is after a careful analysis and not usually as a reaction for attention. If I am doing something for attention, after a breakup, it will be directed at the person and not to the world. :/
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
When someone is super against something related to instincts chances might be that they are that instinct. Because being strongly against something is still a focus on that thing. Whereas blindspot is literally blind, you dont see it or notice it. Of course this is to be taken with a grain of salt cause we all notice bits and pieces about our last instinct.