Don't worry, despite "death" being in the title, no one dies.
Edit: Guess I should add that this is really not for the faint of heart. It's really not the most violent I've seen of these kinds of matches, but there is blood.
Don't worry, despite "death" being in the title, no one dies.
Edit: Guess I should add that this is really not for the faint of heart. It's really not the most violent I've seen of these kinds of matches, but there is blood.
Last edited by Dauphin; 03-13-2018 at 08:27 PM.
would we? I'm a 1 sx/so I definitely feel activated or quickened somehow...alert in a group....and I enjoy having the additional experience of seeing my preoccupation (romantic or non-humanoid, like a project/field of study) through the lens of the group...it's a new way to see myself and my relationship to the person/interest....but to have multiple mates.....hmmm....I would guess POSSIBLE but not a given..... i definitely long for an interest/person in each social situation...a charming interlocutor or someone to confide in, but if I start developing one and my person/interest from earlier comes into view....I almost want one to win my attention and be THE COMPANION while the others are friends, etc. I want to be able to focus on one...to feel WHOLLY and UTTERLY understood and companionated through all experiences of other parts of life... If I had my choice, I'd rather the one partner was with me continuously and multifaceted...because they'd know all varieties of who I am....rather than my having multiple partners in each different scenario who couldn't come with me into foreign fields.
(8-cp6-3 probably)"Fireside" Sx/So (strong sx) - Pulls from Sp/Sx shadow to intensify Sx.
Exhibitionism, wild abandon, most 'on fire' of all stackings and ranges.
SLE sx/so
contra-flow gone awry - she is sx/so (ESE-Fe 1w2?) and her husband is sp/sx (SEI-Si?)
Last edited by silke; 04-21-2018 at 04:23 AM.
Don't you think the women who changed the world with their art and full-on lives like Edith Piaf, Frida Kahlo, Coco Chanel, Marianne Faithfull, Janis Joplin, were all sx/so despite their different socionics types and enneagrams?
“If we look on idly, heaven and earth will never be joined. To join heaven and earth, some decisive deed of purity is necessary. To accomplish so resolute an action, you have to stake your life, giving no thought to personal gain or loss. You have to turn into a dragon and stir up a whirlwind, tear the dark, brooding clouds asunder and soar up into the azure-blue sky. ”
― Yukio Mishima, Runaway Horses
・゚*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:・゚
haha yeah i saw this episode twice. She is either an LSI-se or an EIE in my opionion, and last time I saw it I thought EIE.
This would make sense cause i had her husband as an SLE. And they had a wonderful relationship according to her. (activators)
Ofcourse these two people are both pretty dysfunctional, so that adds to their relationship dynamic i guess.
I can see sx/so for her, and husband idk...
People tend to focus on the more base aspects of sx/so. While it's true that sx/so individuals can be lustful, hedonistic, and materialistic, the libidinal energies can always be redirected toward higher aims. There are/were sx/so ascetics, poets, philosophers, scientists, clergy and so forth.
People tend to see Mishima as a dark and troubled figure, when in reality he can be seen as an sx/so role model. He confronted his traumas and weaknesses, used them to create art, acted on his ideals, and died in the manner he considered most heroic.
I feel like in nearly every slasher film ever at least 90% of the victims are sx/so.
Sometimes I ask myself, "What do you want?", and the most consistent answer that comes back is "Everything".
On the face of it, this doesn't seem too healthy.