VenusRose is a very worshipful and trance like name, flying with sound and magic for the gallery of oceans to new navigation routes flooding the hyper-spatial doorway with colors galore!!*
VenusRose is a very worshipful and trance like name, flying with sound and magic for the gallery of oceans to new navigation routes flooding the hyper-spatial doorway with colors galore!!*
Raptor recently came to the number codes together 24978 and 20816. Star Wars came out in 1977. Kobe was born 1978. 77 is like 11 Bunny ears. 248 is Tyranitar Raptor. 249 is Lugia. 493 is Arceus. 2006 is when France lost. 2013 is when Sant Antonio lost. 13 is like 78. Raptor wrote the beginning of his fiction section in 2016 to start transcending George Lucas. 2016 is when revenge against Raptor for 2006 and 2013 was achieved. But all of that was overcome in 2024, ideas of restored omega granting potions and synthesis of jungle trains hilt of the lightsaber action frenzy grappling for mastery and consoles to render hyperspace conquest dragon fissure ribbon slingshot thunderbolt singularity. This was all Raging Bolt 1021 Marius Florin aka LeoSuperCluster the Raikou, winner of World Cup 2006 and the other Lugia!!
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...k-2024-edition
6w5 sx/so "Beauty/Strength" archetype
same type
Sx/so: sexual spread into the social; cheery but intense feeling. Spread out, whimsical and shiny energy. More on the so side of sx/so:
Example: Polldark series
Last edited by lkdhf qkb; 08-07-2021 at 12:18 PM.
More on the sx side of sx/so. Completely liberated from any self-preservation.
How sp-first people view sp-lasts and in particular sx/so (it's also a little bit biased bc it's Si vs Se, but it's primarily about instincts)
Idk about instincts stuff but I'm Sx/So and this song sounds like it would fit.
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
Is it an Sx/So thing to constantly talk about who and what you are attracted to?
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
From enneagrammer:
The "theatre of sex" is very interesting. The funny thing about the collages on the enneagrammer site to illustrate Sx/So had a lot of pins (or similar pins) in common. Here are some taken from my own Pinterest boards that I think are good examples of Sx/So.
- singular objects of sexual focus as opposed to SO/SX multiplicity, solipsistic, single cleaves as focal points
- SX but with the conscience of social
- attraction/repulsion response, but more elusive than SX/SP due to the abstract audience of SO
- the theatre of sex
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
I've probably posted this before, but it bears repeating.
Sx-first singing about an sx-last.
Last edited by Averroes; 02-11-2023 at 02:55 PM.
I thinkkkk negative sx/so