Attachment 9760
sx/sp 7w8
just figured it out. no wonder I've always felt a relating/comfortability to her.
Attachment 9760
sx/sp 7w8
just figured it out. no wonder I've always felt a relating/comfortability to her.
Why 6?Originally Posted by Cassandra
Hm, I agree with the Sx/Sp. Not with the 7w8.
She's rather 6w7, imo.
And ESI.
most people type her SLE as far as I know.
Almost all Counterphobic 6s get mistyped as SLE.
She's counterphobic and fits the SX 6's preoccupation with beauty, being low-key intimidating, and looking fiercely hot.
If I remember correctly, she's talked about being fearful in some interviews as well, but don't quote me on that.
um.. all sx first are occupied with being attractive. i guess she can low-key intimidating to some people?but it doesnt seem like shes preoccupied with that at all. its more a natural thing because of the 8 thing. i mean shes into astrology and palmistry... i dont see her pushing any sort of aggressive image.
shes too chill and not reactive or judging enough to be 6. she doesnt oscillate between opposites either. i dont see it. the only other type ive thought about for her is 3, but 7w8 feels more right. probably has a 3 fix though. or 4.
Her obsession with astrology and palmistry is pretty Ni HA.um.. all sx first are occupied with being attractive. i guess she can low-key intimidating to some people?
shes too chill and not reactive or judging enough to be 6. she doesnt oscillate between opposites either. i dont see it. the only other type ive thought about for her is 3, but 7w8 feels more right. probably has a 3 fix though. or 4.
She's certainly got a 4 fix, imo.
Her tattoos are pretty CP 6 (and 4 fix), btw.
her tattoos is the only argument you have for her being 6?
tattoos are a pretty sx thing. they show who you are. i dont see any 6ness in her tattoos though. her tattoos are mainly sx, the yin yang, marilyn monroe (sex symbol), the one where it says about a girl who only knew love until a boy broke her heart is sx/sp. sx/sp is the 4ish masochistic stacking.
I've already given other arguments.her tattoos is the only argument you have for her being 6?
Anyway, Type 6 is a type that is to some extent occupied with believing in something.
Her obsession with astrology points towards that. Someone like Tom Cruise, who I'd also type as 6w7, feels the need to believe in something like Scientology.
Believing in something "greater" than them gives them a feeling of security.
And here are some quotes of hers that point at Type 6 pretty obviously.
But this is not the Type 6 thread, so.
Not really, all types can believe in something (how else would you explain that huge parts of the world are religious? whole countries etc.), and 6s can also not believe in anything. Opposites.I've already given other arguments.
Anyway, Type 6 is a type that is to some extent occupied with believing in something.
Her obsession with astrology points towards that. Someone like Tom Cruise, who I'd also type as 6w7, feels the need to believe in something like Scientology.
Believing in something "greater" than them gives them a feeling of security.
And here are some quotes of hers that point at Type 6 pretty obviously.
But this is not the Type 6 thread, so.
By your argument every spiritual person in the world is a type 6, which is obviously not true. Spiritualism can be very 7ish, bored of the "real", physical world. Looking for more fun elsewhere. 7 is a fantasy type, like 4 and 9.
...being afraid of the dark does not make you a type 6. That's ridiculous.
Tom Cruise: probably 3 from intuitive impressions.
Type 6 is sort on-off when it comes to believing in something. A Type 6 is either eternally doubtful, or entirely supports or rejects a belief system.
Most parts of the world are religious, because most people have a 6 fix.
Most spiritual people in the world are 6, 9, and yes, often 7 (SX).
Being afraid of the dark, is not necessarily 6, but being afraid of it at her age, in addition to having all kinds of phobias like that one fear of dry paper, is rather Type 6-like.
In other words, fear plays quite a role in her personal life, which is also rather 6. Describing oneself as neurotic, is another pointer towards a 6 fix, 6 core in particular.
And where have you seen Megan Fox being on-off about her spirituality?
How is phobia of dry paper 6?
That's a very peculiar thing and is not related to any of the types, lol. Probably something happened when she grew up, cut herself on a piece of paper, or something.
*sigh*
fits the theme
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
So obviously I hadn't read it all through... but boy, there's a lot of social stuff going on here. A whole social sphere forming around the idea of the "social blind spots."
As always I'm not going to post social, aka "popular," "mainstream" music since if you really know the idea, you don't need to search for the one thing in the same place. It seems that people here just can't shrug off their current time and cultural frame, which is also part of the "So."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKkmEHeTVGI
https://youtu.be/FFPjFjUonX8?t=787 https://youtu.be/FFPjFjUonX8?t=1182
https://youtu.be/VKkmEHeTVGI?t=391
https://youtu.be/53N99Nim6WE?t=630 https://youtu.be/53N99Nim6WE?t=908 https://youtu.be/53N99Nim6WE?t=1071
okay, this one's just for my generation. And the Americans, ha.
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MS91knuzoOA" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">
Last edited by Neokortex; 03-30-2017 at 11:03 PM.
Except for impaired empathy, an ordinary guy who's looking for down-to-earth, loving, loyal friends and a geeky, warm, voluptuous girlfriend!
And here's some random "Sx/Sp music video" done now for real. Yeah. Urgh. Feel the So blind spot irony there...
https://youtu.be/fM05BGO_nGY?t=23
Except for impaired empathy, an ordinary guy who's looking for down-to-earth, loving, loyal friends and a geeky, warm, voluptuous girlfriend!
Okay, now for real real. Sx/Sp sugar candy real. Self-imitation and stuff. Power-puff.
Except for impaired empathy, an ordinary guy who's looking for down-to-earth, loving, loyal friends and a geeky, warm, voluptuous girlfriend!
The author didn't take into account that this I can have everyone or I can have no one is literally SX all or nothing mentality
The post it's all over the placeThe author didn't take into account that this I can have everyone or I can have no one is literally SX all or nothing mentality
Yeah, and conversely the "it'd be fine to..."/"it'd be nice to..." sentiments seem more like Sx-last lack of willingness to commit to a feeling than a Sx-dom statement. Sp/So and So/Sp mostly exist in the middle ground, it's not all or nothing for them.The author didn't take into account that this I can have everyone or I can have no one is literally SX all or nothing mentality
---
I mostly just lurk on this one since I'd infect it with all my So-dom crap, but this thread has felt inoffensive to me as of late.Come on people, think; what would make a So/Sp feel vaguely claustrophobic and unwelcome? Post that.
Last edited by Stellafera; 03-10-2017 at 02:05 PM.
Yep, partly. What I also critique is that SP is portrayed as so exclusive here, "the one" can be part of self-preservation as well since it provides security and offspring. SP was the first instinct manifested in humans - raw survival: which contains mating. SX is more of the anticipation of spark in the relationship and not "the one" per se.The post it's all over the place
What I find disturbing and off is the obsession with "the one" in the first place. The whole idea that a person's life and desires center around sex and romantic love, I know mine don't. Also, I'm not looking for "the one" at all, why limit myself? More like "the ones".
Like there's so much instinctual variants cover and explain, why is sexuality the only topic brought up over and over? I don't get it. It's like they're stuck on puberty or something. SX=SEX
This mating thing has to go, I'm not a cavewoman.
"The one" is a heteronormative monogamous trap and far from reality.What I find disturbing and off is the obsession with "the one" in the first place. The whole idea that a person's life and desires center around sex and romantic love, I know mine don't. Also, I'm not looking for "the one" at all, why limit myself? More like "the ones".
Like there's so much instinctual variants cover and explain, why is sexuality the only topic brought up over and over? I don't get it. It's like they're stuck on puberty or something. SX=SEX
Not the problem of instincts, but culture. Did you read my blog post on SX with the Rihanna gif on top? I talked a lot about this in there. Especially concerning the misconception.
natalie imbruglia is sx/sp e9, though ...
So show your case for her being one. Bring on the evidence
Mating=sxWhat I find disturbing and off is the obsession with "the one" in the first place. The whole idea that a person's life and desires center around sex and romantic love, I know mine don't. Also, I'm not looking for "the one" at all, why limit myself? More like "the ones".
Like there's so much instinctual variants cover and explain, why is sexuality the only topic brought up over and over? I don't get it. It's like they're stuck on puberty or something. SX=SEX
This mating thing has to go, I'm not a cavewoman.
It is called the "sexual" instinct for a reason...
Sure, SX first people don't only think about "mating" or sex, but come on...
If you cannot relate to the strong bonding aka "merging", intensity, and so forth of sexuality, you might very well be Sp/Sx (or something else) instead.
@LuckyOne
It all goes back to basics we need/have needed to survive as a species
sx=mating
so=be one with the herd
sp=food/shelter
Sx is about merging because it is merging with another person.
There is a difference between intercourse and sex. Sex is juice, sex is attraction and repulsion. If sx wasn't sexual, why is it named SEXUAL?
(SX): Besides the hunger for sex itself, this is the ‘need for heat’, the hunt for ‘electrical juice’, risky excitement and fevered decadence as a narcotic, pushing the envelope, the edge, seeking that peak something, simultaneously exposing oneself to total self-destruction. Also, ‘the World as a mating dance’, the compulsion to broadcast beautiful attractive ‘colors’, casting a net (or a pheromone) out for that special someone to complete an electrical circuit, a nose for the individualized scent of the soul we long to burn our imprint into, and they into ours. Chemistry, not intimacy. Involuntary attraction and repulsion. Archetypally, this Instinct rules the alchemical processes, transformation/transmogrification, base metals into gold, phoenix rising from the ashes, the wild-eyed shaman whirling in fire and blood and radical rebirth. Some authors have sought to tame this Instinct with new names, such as Intimate or one-to-one, but any attempt at reworking the Instinct into something wholesome/spiritual/romantic misses the mark: the Sexual Instinct is raw unbridled wanting, untethered by ethics/morality. Recklessness. A live wire longing to burn…and be burned to death. The classical image of Eros’s arrow (erotic attraction) shot through the heart accurately alludes to the danger here: potential ruin and destruction under the guise of Love.
Humans naturally gravitate towards ancient beliefs for guidance since they're insecure. "Romance" (=bs) is the glue that holds a mirage together so it's no surpriseTo be honest I'm putting a certain poster here on ignore, because I can't deal with the old fashioned fantasy world things I see in every single fucking thread I go no matter the subject, always about duals, which to this person obviously can only mean romantic mates, it's like Socionics is a Sabrina romance or somethingNot to mention the gross misconceptions and overgeneralizations in Enneagram. Really, some people don't live in the real word.
I did, it really drove it home to me.
Ah I see you quoted it, that's exactly the paragraphs I referred to
Noo sx is not monogamy, monogamy is a type of relationship, and sx is not relationships. I have not known any sx firsts that can handle an open/polygamous relationship though, meaning their partner is with other people. We are way too jealous and obsessed for that.. It's more common with sx 2nds ime.
@LuckyOne What exactly do you think sx is if it's core isn't sexual?
Then tell me what is the point you're trying to make?
Attraction/repulsion is a central part of sx.
Is this an ad hominem? =D I have never been interested in polyamorous relationships, I am too jealous and possesive. I don't share.There are several types of polyamorous (not polygamous) relationships, clearly you are not versed into them.
SX is only the hormone rush. The sexual element is the self-pres body, pressured through the social instinct which has the premise of human "cohesion".
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
