Attachment 9760
sx/sp 7w8
just figured it out. no wonder I've always felt a relating/comfortability to her.
Attachment 9760
sx/sp 7w8
just figured it out. no wonder I've always felt a relating/comfortability to her.
Almost all Counterphobic 6s get mistyped as SLE.
She's counterphobic and fits the SX 6's preoccupation with beauty, being low-key intimidating, and looking fiercely hot.
If I remember correctly, she's talked about being fearful in some interviews as well, but don't quote me on that.
um.. all sx first are occupied with being attractive. i guess she can low-key intimidating to some people? but it doesnt seem like shes preoccupied with that at all. its more a natural thing because of the 8 thing. i mean shes into astrology and palmistry... i dont see her pushing any sort of aggressive image.
shes too chill and not reactive or judging enough to be 6. she doesnt oscillate between opposites either. i dont see it. the only other type ive thought about for her is 3, but 7w8 feels more right. probably has a 3 fix though. or 4.
her tattoos is the only argument you have for her being 6? alright
tattoos are a pretty sx thing. they show who you are. i dont see any 6ness in her tattoos though. her tattoos are mainly sx, the yin yang, marilyn monroe (sex symbol), the one where it says about a girl who only knew love until a boy broke her heart is sx/sp. sx/sp is the 4ish masochistic stacking.
I've already given other arguments.
Anyway, Type 6 is a type that is to some extent occupied with believing in something.
Her obsession with astrology points towards that. Someone like Tom Cruise, who I'd also type as 6w7, feels the need to believe in something like Scientology.
Believing in something "greater" than them gives them a feeling of security.
And here are some quotes of hers that point at Type 6 pretty obviously.
But this is not the Type 6 thread, so.
Not really, all types can believe in something (how else would you explain that huge parts of the world are religious? whole countries etc.), and 6s can also not believe in anything. Opposites.
By your argument every spiritual person in the world is a type 6, which is obviously not true. Spiritualism can be very 7ish, bored of the "real", physical world. Looking for more fun elsewhere. 7 is a fantasy type, like 4 and 9.
...being afraid of the dark does not make you a type 6. That's ridiculous.
Tom Cruise: probably 3 from intuitive impressions.
Type 6 is sort on-off when it comes to believing in something. A Type 6 is either eternally doubtful, or entirely supports or rejects a belief system.
Most parts of the world are religious, because most people have a 6 fix.
Most spiritual people in the world are 6, 9, and yes, often 7 (SX).
Being afraid of the dark, is not necessarily 6, but being afraid of it at her age, in addition to having all kinds of phobias like that one fear of dry paper, is rather Type 6-like.
In other words, fear plays quite a role in her personal life, which is also rather 6. Describing oneself as neurotic, is another pointer towards a 6 fix, 6 core in particular.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
So obviously I hadn't read it all through... but boy, there's a lot of social stuff going on here. A whole social sphere forming around the idea of the "social blind spots."
As always I'm not going to post social, aka "popular," "mainstream" music since if you really know the idea, you don't need to search for the one thing in the same place. It seems that people here just can't shrug off their current time and cultural frame, which is also part of the "So."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKkmEHeTVGI
https://youtu.be/FFPjFjUonX8?t=787 https://youtu.be/FFPjFjUonX8?t=1182
https://youtu.be/VKkmEHeTVGI?t=391
https://youtu.be/53N99Nim6WE?t=630 https://youtu.be/53N99Nim6WE?t=908 https://youtu.be/53N99Nim6WE?t=1071
okay, this one's just for my generation. And the Americans, ha.
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MS91knuzoOA" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">
Last edited by Neokortex; 03-30-2017 at 11:03 PM.
Except for impaired empathy, an ordinary guy who's looking for down-to-earth, loving, loyal friends and a geeky, warm, voluptuous girlfriend!
And here's some random "Sx/Sp music video" done now for real. Yeah. Urgh. Feel the So blind spot irony there...
https://youtu.be/fM05BGO_nGY?t=23
Except for impaired empathy, an ordinary guy who's looking for down-to-earth, loving, loyal friends and a geeky, warm, voluptuous girlfriend!
Okay, now for real real. Sx/Sp sugar candy real. Self-imitation and stuff. Power-puff.
Except for impaired empathy, an ordinary guy who's looking for down-to-earth, loving, loyal friends and a geeky, warm, voluptuous girlfriend!
Yeah, and conversely the "it'd be fine to..."/"it'd be nice to..." sentiments seem more like Sx-last lack of willingness to commit to a feeling than a Sx-dom statement. Sp/So and So/Sp mostly exist in the middle ground, it's not all or nothing for them.
---
I mostly just lurk on this one since I'd infect it with all my So-dom crap, but this thread has felt inoffensive to me as of late. Come on people, think; what would make a So/Sp feel vaguely claustrophobic and unwelcome? Post that.
Last edited by Stellafera; 03-10-2017 at 02:05 PM.
Yep, partly. What I also critique is that SP is portrayed as so exclusive here, "the one" can be part of self-preservation as well since it provides security and offspring. SP was the first instinct manifested in humans - raw survival: which contains mating. SX is more of the anticipation of spark in the relationship and not "the one" per se.
What I find disturbing and off is the obsession with "the one" in the first place. The whole idea that a person's life and desires center around sex and romantic love, I know mine don't. Also, I'm not looking for "the one" at all, why limit myself? More like "the ones".
Like there's so much instinctual variants cover and explain, why is sexuality the only topic brought up over and over? I don't get it. It's like they're stuck on puberty or something. SX=SEX
This mating thing has to go, I'm not a cavewoman.
It is called the "sexual" instinct for a reason...
Sure, SX first people don't only think about "mating" or sex, but come on...
If you cannot relate to the strong bonding aka "merging", intensity, and so forth of sexuality, you might very well be Sp/Sx (or something else) instead.
@LuckyOne
It all goes back to basics we need/have needed to survive as a species
sx=mating
so=be one with the herd
sp=food/shelter
Sx is about merging because it is merging with another person.
There is a difference between intercourse and sex. Sex is juice, sex is attraction and repulsion. If sx wasn't sexual, why is it named SEXUAL?
(SX): Besides the hunger for sex itself, this is the ‘need for heat’, the hunt for ‘electrical juice’, risky excitement and fevered decadence as a narcotic, pushing the envelope, the edge, seeking that peak something, simultaneously exposing oneself to total self-destruction. Also, ‘the World as a mating dance’, the compulsion to broadcast beautiful attractive ‘colors’, casting a net (or a pheromone) out for that special someone to complete an electrical circuit, a nose for the individualized scent of the soul we long to burn our imprint into, and they into ours. Chemistry, not intimacy. Involuntary attraction and repulsion. Archetypally, this Instinct rules the alchemical processes, transformation/transmogrification, base metals into gold, phoenix rising from the ashes, the wild-eyed shaman whirling in fire and blood and radical rebirth. Some authors have sought to tame this Instinct with new names, such as Intimate or one-to-one, but any attempt at reworking the Instinct into something wholesome/spiritual/romantic misses the mark: the Sexual Instinct is raw unbridled wanting, untethered by ethics/morality. Recklessness. A live wire longing to burn…and be burned to death. The classical image of Eros’s arrow (erotic attraction) shot through the heart accurately alludes to the danger here: potential ruin and destruction under the guise of Love.
Noo sx is not monogamy, monogamy is a type of relationship, and sx is not relationships. I have not known any sx firsts that can handle an open/polygamous relationship though, meaning their partner is with other people. We are way too jealous and obsessed for that.. It's more common with sx 2nds ime.
@LuckyOne What exactly do you think sx is if it's core isn't sexual?
Then tell me what is the point you're trying to make?
Attraction/repulsion is a central part of sx.
Is this an ad hominem? =D I have never been interested in polyamorous relationships, I am too jealous and possesive. I don't share.There are several types of polyamorous (not polygamous) relationships, clearly you are not versed into them.
SX is only the hormone rush. The sexual element is the self-pres body, pressured through the social instinct which has the premise of human "cohesion".