I promise if you keep searching for everything beautiful in this world, you will eventually become it.
I promise if you keep searching for everything beautiful in this world, you will eventually become it.
you're saying this like I don't get it, but I do get it--I just don't like it; its a really ugly quality that most IEIs suffer from made worse from their general pretension as moral seers and guides. they can't even see their own basic flaws but they make it their business to peddle narratives in order to mind control people
now I know this is just going to turn the focus on me, and it is true I have my own flaws; so we can discuss them if that's what people feel I deserve since I was so quick to comment on others but it doesn't change the fact IEIs are a big joke
Bertrand, since when did you ever have morals?
No one cares. Maybe you should stop focusing so much on your own Fi HA, and you wouldn't be so neurotic.
Now let's see how you try to twist that around and make excuses for yourself, instead of accepting your own "moral culpability".
Is that your attempt at being evasive again? lol... your response was cuter than I thought. To be honest, I'm not really interested in "arguing" with you I'd suppose, but you just seem to be genuinely a little neurotic, dude. It's like as if you're scapegoating and picking on weaker folks. It's not cool.
Yeah, but is it actually Ti that you are using? The way IEI's think is primarily inductive. They don't analyze theories in the same way that you do, you have specific structures set up in your mind, traceable links that form symmetrical correlations. IEI thinking, in comparison, is fuzzier, is done in leaps, and isn't something I would even call coherent by nature. At least, not coherent in an academic sense. There is a stark difference between that and what I see in you.
Hey, feel free to PM me with any opinions about my type
I was joking of course. It could be interpreted in the way you mention, which is a good point. However, another way to interpret it is that IEI is not this super rare type that very few people can type as. It's more common than people think especially on the internet, which is why I think the majority of IEI self-typings in this forum are correct. Sure, there are a minority of IEI self-typings that are wrong, but that can apply to basically any type. IEIs in this forum specifically tend to get retyped way too often. I'm not talking about your retypings of self-typed IEIs specifically btw , but rather in general because I've seen even other posters doubt that you are IEI as well or other posters doubt other people's typings of IEI.
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
What type is I?
Hi, I am back for the time being.
I struggle with motivation, apathy and sticking to goals.
Jung's work is scattered and lacks proper systematic basis. True that LIIs are sometimes scattered as well as they gradually might redefine everything in a system in endless cycle. Gulenko, anyone? Does it converge towards the truth locally or even even globally? You can not say that newer works are better than some of the older ones. He is clearly valuing.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
What Jung lacks in sympathetic perception, Socionics lacks in a adjudication. Actually, they both lack both, as far as it looks to me.
I struggle with motivation, apathy and sticking to goals.
@Bertrand I still think you're ILI or SLI with focus on Fi HA until further notice.
・゚*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:・゚
The 2017 Updated List With Two new additions: Handjob, Cassandra
ILE-Ti: Myst, Transkar, LuchoisLurking, JWC3
ILE-Ne: Geneiouws, Lagerdemon, Cubazoan
ESE-Fi: Chipsnunderwear, Suz, Inumbra, Subteigh
ESE-Si: Mu4, Wacey, Xerx, Esaman, KrigtheViking, Hacim
LII-Ti: N0ki, MuddyTextures, Reactance
LII-Ne: Kimuchi
SEI-Si: johannesbloem, chriscorey, the whole english
SEI-Fe: BnD, crazedrat, dinki
SLE-Se: herzy, mercutio, ananke
SLE-Ti: agee, kill4me
LSI-Se: Spider, Missbabydoll
LSI-Ti: Rocky
IEI-Fe: Allie, Pink, SisofNight, Cassandra
IEI-Ni: Starfall, Glam, Elina, Strrrng, Velvet
EIE-Fe:
EIE-Ni: Gilly, Darya, Bain, Sarinana
SEE-Se: Woofwoofl, Handjob
SEE-Fi: Lucas, Aquagraph
LIE-Ni: Ineffable, Moonraker
LIE-Te: Ashton, FDG, Expat, Invisiblehim, Narc
ESI-Se: DiscoJoe, EJArendee, Jet City Woman, MisterNi, Scarletluxx, Amber/Rosewood
ESI-Fi: Lungs, Golden, Ouronis, Radio, Suedehead, Galen, Kore
ILI-Ni: Scapegrace, Korpsey, Krieger, Cpig, InvisibleJim
ILI-Te: Marie, Mensupermateriam, Aestrivex
SLI-Si: Words, Stray
SLI-Te: kim, daft punk, directorabbie, pookie, Jessica, may
LSE-Te: Absurd, JimBean
LSE-Si: William, JackOliverAaron, BurningIce, Timmy, Smilingeyes, Laurie’s Crusader
IEE-Ne: Elizathomason, UDP, Sapphire
IEE-Fi: Finale, Airman/airborne, Adam Strange
EII-Ne: Aylen
EII-Fi: Maritsa/beautiful sky, silke, sol, zero, mikemex, IBTL, Contra
Please don't confuse me with my lookalike, I'm not a sensor.
Oh shit, I forgot about stray. Miss that guy.
Didn't see that one yet. Dang how did Mu get ESE tho, and @Adam Strange has my type lmao now we know why we're soulmates
Sigh, Ti type problems.
・゚*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:・゚
@echidna1000 as LSE? lol. If anything other than ILE I would've guessed ESE. LSE is a new one
Because he types using his own made up system that is based primarily on iridology, then validated by his own valued Fi. I am EII-Ne on his list because he considers me his conflictor after I inadvertently hurt his feelings years ago. At first he typed me your identical, IEE, but then he switched to conflictor. I didn't notice if you made the new list since I didn't bother reading it. I know what is on it. He has never actually seen my irises but he imagines they are identical to those of some psycho killer named Jodi Arias which he has posted about a couple of times. Because it is obvious that a psycho like her can only be EII in his system.
He can't tell the difference between Fe and social instinct. He has no idea what Ni is at all so he wouldn't recognize it if his life depended on it. He considers himself a badass SLE with mad typing skills that has the ability to type random people on the internet that he has never had a conversation with. He is very similar to Sol. Maybe sol will return to us too soon and they can have a type off. <3
That about sums everything up.
"Iridology"
Divination of all sorts of things based on iris patterns goes back to ancient Egypt, to Chaldea in Babylonia, and to ancient Greece, as documented in stone inscriptions, painted ceramic artefacts, and the writings of Hippocrates. There will always be a market for hocus-pocus, and "clinical" divination based on iris patterns persists today.
There is a popular belief in systematic changes in the iris patterns, reflecting the state of health of each of the organs in the body, one's mood or personality, and revealing one's future. Practitioners skilled in the art of interpreting these aspects of iris patterns for diagnosing clients' health, personality, and mutual compatibilities, are called iridologists. Like palm-readers and fortune-tellers, iridologists will offer advice on all of these matters by inspecting your iris. If you are interested in this sort of thing, a chart showing how each individual organ of the body is somehow "connected" to a specific spot on each iris for diagnosis is shown here. How personality is determined is revealed here, and a more elaborate theory of interpersonal compatibility based on iris patterns is detailed here.
Some limited types of changes in iris appearance can occur and do have a scientific basis: (1) In the first few months of life, a blanket of chromatophore cells in the anterior layer of the iris establishes eye colour; until this pigmentation develops, babies typically - even if only temporarily - have blue eyes. (2) Some pharmacological treatments for glaucoma involving prostoglandin analogues are reported to affect melanin, and therefore iris pigmentation, when applied topically to the eye. Such possible changes in iris colour are irrelevant for the method of iris recognition described here, as imaging is done with monochrome cameras and using infrared illumination in the 700nm - 900nm band; melanin is almost completely non-absorbant at these wavelengths. (3) Freckles can develop over time in the iris, as elsewhere on the body. Again these are spots of melanin pigmentation, invisible in the infrared illumination used for iris recognition, so they neither help nor hinder in the identification of the iris pattern. (4) Elderly persons' eyes sometimes show a thin white ring surrounding the iris. This is an optical opacity that develops with age in the base of the cornea, where it joins the sclera.
As for the occult belief that iris patterns reveal the state of one's organs and so may change systematically over time, there have been five reviews published in medical journals reporting various scientific tests of iridology (Berggren, 1985; Cockburn, 1981; Worrall, 1984, 1985; Knipschild, 1988; Simon, Worthen, and Mitas, 1979), and they all dismiss iridology as a medical fraud. In particular, the review by Berggren (1985) concludes: "Good care of patients is inconsistent with deceptive methods, and iridology should be regarded as a medical fraud."
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
The list could be deliberate to create mayhem Hacim, not LII? That's comedy aw yeah