I think I can fake beint any type, as in wearing a given type changes how I think and react to others. :3 Definitely a noticeable placebo effect.
I think I can fake beint any type, as in wearing a given type changes how I think and react to others. :3 Definitely a noticeable placebo effect.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Persephone ESFJ
Eris ESFP
Fe types dramatization.
Conflictors may to have not best, but mediocre, relations.
It needs to separate duties (to minimize tasks needing serious collaboration), give not lesser than basic social support, restrict direct claims and critic (as this is commonly done by nonvalued functions).
Basic support for example is, from ESTJ side means to give normal income/protection (Se) and social status (Ti), from INFP to behave morally and friendly (Fi), to be wise? and help to see the life more complexly (Ne).
It's not relations of friendship, it's relations of respect and responsibility. Typical style in past. Such relations can be relatively nice, if both have something more to each other, like sexual passion, love to children, ... And better when both have something good outside of family like the job they like, friends, etc.
I saw long relations of conflictors. I can't name them good, but no one died there. I'm sure they could be better.
What would you type me based on these passages?
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Do me.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Here you make efficiency of action But you use this Te in the negativist sense "it is waste of time"
− Te - useless, unprofitable, wasteful, utilization, deterioration, exhaustion, costs, expenses, risk-taking, experimentation, sales, trade, action in atmosphere of chaos, ingenuity
This is where I would venture to say that you don't use much imagination. So either you lack Ne or that Ne becomes almost a product of your own content state
This is where you came off as a "realist to me" where I felt like you were on the Se/Ti divide
Here I felt like the "I'll worry about that later" But you make a lot of judgement of right and correct behavior "worrying about it now is stupid"
− Te - useless, unprofitable, wasteful, utilization, deterioration, exhaustion, costs, expenses, risk-taking, experimentation, sales, trade, action in atmosphere of chaos, ingenuity;
You show morals here
Again a realist
I don't know what this means
Not type related
You see how is this supposed to be interpreted in terms of how you energy flows?
Same thing as above. This says nothing about you.
How do you feel? Does this lead you to mistrust of others? Is it easy for you to trust and believe in what people say to be the truth?
This tells me that you like to set limits + Se - retention of power, insubordination, defense, cover, countermove, counterattack, firmness, defense of one's interests, strong-willed pressure from the bottom upwards, strength, will, possession;
Again you use other "real and tangible" objects as your measuring device and it's not internal. I'm thinking that you are more extraverted now that I read this.
Don't know what to make of this.
Subjective morals here was where I feel like you use Fi
I don't know how to interpret this only to say it's not a subjective response.
Why not?
This is where I wonder about you being a Tactical type.
Objective
One can assume you know what to look for when you say it involves Se
Negativist I would interpret this to be very negativist. + Ni - future, change in the situation over time, prediction, premonition, gradual development, evolution, gradual ascent, the dynamics of change, the flow of time, imagination, harmonious description, subtle step-by-step changes, convergence, confluence;
realist
Doesn't say anything
Doesn't say anything
realist
Here's true use of what should be correct behavior. Please read my signature.
Doesn't say anything
realist
Realist. Again very tangible
Nothing here
You don't seem to be all that interested in esoteric conversations or thought just for the curiosity of it.
Realist
One of the hardest ways to type someone is using questionnaires because you are not physically around and I can't see how you direct your energy and what for. So with that said you will already note that it's not 100% accurate. So let's commence the best we can.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Now that I've been able to accurately determine my type (ENTp / ILE-NE with 7w8 / SCUEI,) I'm simply in this forum to watch Sol screech: "But you are F! I know dis! You are F, Заткнись, иди на хуй! Ты мудак!"
HET2.jpg
FF
5 planets in Scorpio: Sun, Moon, Mercury, Venus & Mars. Probably not a shrinking violet.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Partially correct. Extroverted Ethics. However, I'm (Fe ) Super-Id block.
Ego block for an ENTP would be Ne or Ti. MY Subtype is definitely Ne.
FF
Last edited by FeloniousFunk; 07-13-2016 at 05:58 AM.
5 planets in Scorpio: Sun, Moon, Mercury, Venus & Mars. Probably not a shrinking violet.
So no, I'm most definitely NOT (Fe) Ego block.
5 planets in Scorpio: Sun, Moon, Mercury, Venus & Mars. Probably not a shrinking violet.
Some possibility of Fi stays for him, but it's much fewer than Fe. Excluding Fi leading types.
The only definite thing is your type is not T type and you have nothing reasonable to say other. While Fe are the most possible types for you.
P.S. He or moderators should to create a separate typing thread for him.
Last edited by Sol; 07-13-2016 at 08:21 AM.
Inappropriate sexual fantasies used as "dirty words" are not common for Si types, as this expresses aversion, and hence is more common for Se valued types. So taking into account rather more possibility of Fe, then IEI and EIE are left for our patient.
Everybody sees, that you don't use logical argumentation, but prefer inappropriate emotional and personal messages. It's impossibly for T types.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
What is the point of provoking someone to get angry to show their emotions? In other words, it's like you're saying he provoked him to provoke him.
If I provoke people, I do it to find out what they think, and what their attitudes are, and what their future behavior might be like -- not what they feel. Feelings are ephemeral; to understand them, we need to know what's driving them in the first place.
Specifically, I provoke to . . .
- uncover others' biases / expose what they aren't saying
- get a feeling for how much latent aggression they're storing, so that I know whether they're likely to attack in future
- expose something ugly and vulnerable about myself rather than wait for the other person to discover it and think they've got something on me
- divert attention to the ugly things in me that I can live with people scrutinizing, rather than have them search for the things I'd rather they not see
- make a point without having to do so explicitly
- let people hang themselves with their own rope
- find out what people's behavior patterns are if it's not already obvious to me
There are plenty of people online who provoke for entertainment -- y'know, trolls. I sort of know how to troll but rarely do it. I've usually nothing to gain from it.
Point being, not all combative behavior is provocation. And not all provocation has the same goals. And it would be incorrect to conclude that all provocation = Fe, if indeed you think it does.
Last edited by golden; 07-13-2016 at 12:46 PM.
Sol,
Sweetheart, I dare say your F is showing I knew you'd take the bait eventually--hook, line and sinker.
I was either going to type as an INTp or an ENTp. The question was which. I just enjoy watching your hysterics as you scream at yet another person that they're an F and don't deserve to play in your T sandbox.
Keep it up, man. It's quite entertaining.
FF
Last edited by FeloniousFunk; 07-13-2016 at 03:00 PM.
5 planets in Scorpio: Sun, Moon, Mercury, Venus & Mars. Probably not a shrinking violet.
Sol was a rather irritable baby until his mother discovered that she was putting his pacifier into the wrong hole.
5 planets in Scorpio: Sun, Moon, Mercury, Venus & Mars. Probably not a shrinking violet.
He provoked to get sol to show more anger (like you stated above). I'm not saying all provoking is Fe, but in order to sense emotional state of others some provoking becomes Fe. .. Same as aggression but in another form, more possibly less force or Se becomes the role function either way poked at sol with a stick @Sol please please please leave it alone
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 07-13-2016 at 04:02 PM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
FeloniousFunk look at your profile pic. You look like youre about to cry. Youre F.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung