@Eris you should feel lucky to know me. You'll actually have a chance to dualize.
@Eris you should feel lucky to know me. You'll actually have a chance to dualize.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
・゚*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:・゚
Yes lol I have a professional degree in it. Anyway this conversation will go no where. @Eris but what you suggest for them to do [logic OF action above] may work for some but for people like yourself who can't see it for themselves sometimes they need to be pointed out
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 07-07-2016 at 07:01 AM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I'm not your dual.
I am not your dual.
I don't seek Fi and Ne.
I probably have even more Fi than you and it's only my creative.
Si and Ne annoy me.
Si is my IGNORING FUNCTION.
I seek Ni.
The fuck is so hard about this?
You can say some bullshit about how it's a process that I can't see but somehow you can even though you're a stranger that doesn't know anything about me...
But I know me. And if someone says they don't like a function, odds are that they don't value it and it doesn't take a fucking professional or degree to know that.
I'M NOT YOUR FUCKING DUAL AND YOU'RE ONE OF MY LEAST FAVORITE PEOPLE HERE.
I've known EII IRL and I know they're not my dual. I supervise them.
lyin ass lmao
psych degree prolly
I HAVE A BOYFRIEND WHO I LOVE VERY MUCH
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Next up, breathing is Si.
Like, are you fucking stupid?
Um, yeah, so do you type everyone that makes a [SAR-CAS-TIC] suggestion Te dom?
Do you, like, not understand that everyone uses all the functions they value the most, and even the ones they don't?
And that could just as easily be a Se observation / Se saying what action you should take.
・゚*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:・゚
Haha. What happened to this thread. xD it clearly states "Your typing of the forum members".
It's purely subjective, opinions from people. Post types, not huge discussion. Degenerate faggits
-
Sincerely,
Your retard
FeloniousFunk - INFP
There is no such restriction for this thread.
Just another example where wannabe-ILI shows significant interest to people's feelings and their manipulation inappropriate for his selftyping.
FeloniousFunk, I understand that idiotic barking is natural for you. But to play in this game in different threads would mean to be on same intellectual and moral levels like you. It's not my case and hence is not interesting for me. So I recommend you to read forum's rules or you'll be baned or will get restrictions to keep your behavior more adequate. To say clear: when someone disagrees with your opinion, this does not mean it's appropriate to make direct personal insults in return. Even if you are not able to oppose something reasonable.
Last edited by Sol; 07-13-2016 at 05:12 PM.
Kimu - LIE
I have to say, I'm not seeing enough likeness between the personalities of Eris and Abbie for them to be the same type...
For one, Eris comes across to me as "pushy" in a way that seems like an effort to be socially dominant, while at the same time being mindful of personal affect. This is more apparent with people who he seems to share a lasting, understood relationship with (see interactions with Chryssie):
Eris - Report Shout06-09-2016 07:24 PM
Chryssie exercising regularly, try it.
Eris - Report Shout05-31-2016 01:58 PM
Chryssie, don't start Si ramblings. I go online to escape that kind of shit.
Eris - Report Shout05-30-2016 01:54 AM
Chryssie you're definitely a Si Dom. Si doms are paranoid scared little babies
In my direction I see a more neutral interaction, but comments are still directive, aimed, deliberate in most all cases. I interpret this as his not being overly assuming in his relations, rather he knows the distance in his relations. Not inclined to hide his feelings and opinions; rather appears to express at first opportunity in very clear language.
And I really don't have the vigor to deal with this anymore because I think I'm getting depressed again.I'M NOT YOUR FUCKING DUAL AND YOU'RE ONE OF MY LEAST FAVORITE PEOPLE HERE.
I don't have a firm type reference point to base my interactive perspective on, but my opinion of my own interactions with Eris is that the honest, clear affect is somewhat refreshing while the way it's delivered seems a bit over-assertive for my tastes. This is purely from seeing real-time shoutbox interaction. It's my opinion that typing should take the form of cited examples that can be supported by applying the structure of the theory itself. Lay it all out for debate and review; degrees and "vibes" aren't really relevant, only analysis. Trying to type Eris in this way seems beneficial, to me.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
IEI are warmer, less willing to insult deeply but insult and then show affection. Their skittishness is Fi demonstrative. ILI don't really care about how they have insulted you and are not as warm.
EII are more forgiving and kinder. Their ability to hold relations despite a difficult person is their Fi base.
Please stop insulting her and him. If you stop he will too. He just gave a really nice example of his passion with something over time and he explained how those things started and developed in a dynamic way.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I also have a degree in Typing. I am 100% certifiable.
Improving your happiness and changing your personality for the better
Jungian theory is not grounded in empirical data (pdf file)
The case against type dynamics (pdf file)
Cautionary comments regarding the MBTI (pdf file)
Reinterpreting the MBTI via the five-factor model (pdf file)
Do the Big Five personality traits interact to predict life outcomes? (pdf file)
The Big Five personality test outperformed the Jungian and Enneagram test in predicting life outcomes
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traits
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I agree he is LSE. I changed my attitude toward him to show good will and then he changed toward me to show good will. I realized there was more of a communication problem due to language differences. At first I thought he was just a bot.
He is not a bad person and I have no real reason to conflict with him over a theory. One on one private interaction is where the problems would start to manifest. I found this out from a close friendship that I had with someone who I thought was SLE but turns out they are probably LSE. The closer we got, the differences in values became an issue. Sad really because I cared a lot about the person, as a friend only. We probably should have kept more distance in order to maintain our friendship. I will not make that mistake again.
I think he knows I don't mean him any harm or disrespect. He also knows I am going to disagree with him when I feel he is wrong. He has no problem trying to correct me either. I am sure I would hang myself if I had to live with him though.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
How much do you charge for a typing, Maritsa? I'm just hiding out here in the homeless camp trying to avoid the knives of some murderers for the time being, but I have a few bags of crushed cans I can offer for your services. The only thing I know about myself for absolutely certain is that I'm an introvert of some type, probably intuitive, but I'm not even sure of that.
type me ;0 unless I'm just SEI as predicted
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html