Last edited by Amber; 07-17-2014 at 11:27 AM.
IS THIS YOU??
(called it first )
does it finally fit your mental picture of me?
It's a friend I've typed as ILE-Ti.
. Attachment 3922
My mental picture of you wears less clothes
She's nice looking, don't be so sensitive @William, finding her hot is extremely approperiate
I shouldn't have posted those pics. Everyone takes E 5s for expressionless ugly ducklings instead of looking at their deeper motivations. Michelle Pfeiffer, Ralph Fiennes, or Georgia O'keeffe as standard images are out of question. But at least you are around my self-typing area.
Looks SLE to me.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Solaris, this forum is not your personal playground to troll ppl.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
No I wasn't. See this is what I meant by wild accusations. If you want to keep your threads on subject then chill out with that stuff. Seems like reasonable advice to me, be cool BTW as a side note - I think this is really interesting stuff though in regards to either your socionic type or your ennea type, how you assume (incorrectly) my motivations and probably others as well.
Last edited by Amber; 07-18-2014 at 01:44 PM.
6w5 cp is obvious.
I had forgotten the sx/so imitation cat in a corner for a while. I'm kind of catalyzed.
I said that it is well-known that you are 6w5. You are acting out in a typical E6 fashion, and have said nothing to make me think that you are indeed E5. I have said that I'm sure you're IJ, And that I suspect you of being ISFj. I don't see what crass mistyping you are imagining. Further to the point, you have said yourself that I am erasonably in line with what you self-type as. So why are you taking such offence?
E6 is laughable, Solaris has as much anxiety as Mercutios micropenis has girth.
you're Fi polr, have no clue about "offence" etc. and last week you were typing me IEI or smth. You'd like me to be E6, yes, for some mysterious reason (I recall you were considering E5 for yourself a while ago - have you even finished your high school studies?). And you seem to take Enneagram very seriously, like a good old Ti creative who cannot read people through other means but ready-made "systemic categorization". Any opinion on my friend's Sociotype btw?
Mercutio has shown no meaningful understanding of either Socionics or enneagram.
Monkey see, monkey do.
That's a really strong argument you've got going there. Funny how you typed me sx first numerous times before with exactly the same avatars
I wouldn't dislike you so much if I weren't Sx first, don't worry.
Your words, not mine.
Well at least we have two things in common - love of cats and passionate hatred for people..Sometimes you have to work with what you've got.
But back to the VI of your friend, who is very pretty and probably ExTx something.
I only typed you SX first once, when you first came here, made a long vivid post and asked to be typed. I was wrong. I took E3-4 loud glamor style for Sx first. But you may be hot enough, even if you VI right as some of Silke's so/sp typings http://www.pinterest.com/vonsain/sosp/. Being Sx first doesn't have much to do with looking good. All stacks can be attractive. Thanks for expressing an opinion about my friend's type and not making the whole thread *only* about you and your feelings. Btw you could make a poll and ask everyone about your stack, as narc did.