What is your father's type?
Pretty sure we must have had a poll like this before, if only because I remember a time when everybody's mother was ESE. I'm going to do separate polls for each parent because then it may give some interesting gender stats and also because your parents might both be the same type!
I am going to make the poll multi-choice in case you can't settle on a type, which may result in a few joke answers.
all fathers are Te and all moms are Fe
The typings do seem biased, much like the ESE mother phenomenon. Especially notable is the lack of ESEs, who tend to have a stronger parental instinct. There is some gender disparity when it comes to logic/ethics but still...Originally Posted by Amber
at the moment, the most common typings are the same as what I have...seems like people's mothers are ESI now rather than ESE.
no ethicals so far.
Fe-ESE 1w2 sp/so
Step-dad ILI
Bio - I dunno maybe EIE (he doesn't show much interest in any of his 6 children though. we have different mothers)
Mom is probably LSI
Last edited by Aylen; 05-11-2014 at 01:18 AM.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I described EIE type to my mom and she said that it fits bio dad but I already voted so can't add to the poll.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
LSE-Te
E8-SP
ILI-Te.
Only two XXFx fathers from the lot of us? Come on guys
Adoptive father ILE, biological father INFp.
Now this is a story all about how, my type got changed, turned upside down. Just wait for a minute and watch chatbox right there, & I'll tell how Gem became the moderator with blue hair.
In typology central friended and praised, on the picture thread was where she spent most her days. Chilling out, selfies, relaxing all cool, And all typing some people and getting them schooled.
When a couple of girls who were up to no good, Started annoying her & her friends in the forumhood, She got in one little flame war & got pissed off & said 'I'm moving in with that exboyfriend in the forum with the socionics toffs.
So Gem pulls up to the forum for a year without being a hater, And yells to typocentral 'Yo creeps! Smell Ya later', Became a mod in her kingdom she was finally there, To sit on her throne as the mod with blue hair.
InvisibruJim
My dad is LIE
LSE. THE MOST LSE OF LSES THAT ANYONE COULD EVER LSE
Father is probably Te dom, always about the what where when who etc. Very dependant on factual information (annoyingly so). He's sensing, with a very visible Si. He really savours thinking about food, holidays etc. He's susceptible to Fe, really getting into anything which is on tv and very noisy about that. Very good with doing things (making stuff, fixing stuff, numbers, etc etc).
He is oblivious to deeper feelings though, doesn't understand the mood, extremely ignorant of subtle social cues. Flies off into action whenever there is a "problem" even when innapproperiate.
Will keep his personal feelings pent up. He's submissive in his relationship. Primarily physical caregiver with providing snacks, drinks etc and enjoys that tremendously.
Don't know his type exactly, i've been thinking LSI lately.
My dad is EIE. Very.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
ESI, very difficult to doubt it. Fi and Se in one person gives a very interesting mix. E 8w7. Probably Se-lead.
edit: actually it's SEE-Se 8w7 sp/sx
Last edited by aisa; 04-08-2015 at 01:03 PM.
Same here! Your EII now?
As we reach for the stars, we must put away childish things; gods, spirits and other phantasms of the brain. Reality is cruel and unforgiving, yet we must steel ourselves and secure the survival of our race through the unflinching pursuit of science and technology.
- Stellaris
yeah, my dad is both a very sensitive person and a very decisive person with an "edge" to him
when you see Fi and then Se - it's like seeing a walking contradiction of sorts
lol, I'm all kinds of things nowYour EII now?confused, but pretty likely not SLI after all...
It's funny because his Fi stops his Se.yeah, my dad is both a very sensitive person and a very decisive person with an "edge" to him
when you see Fi and then Se - it's like seeing a walking contradiction of sorts
No worries I've replied.
As we reach for the stars, we must put away childish things; gods, spirits and other phantasms of the brain. Reality is cruel and unforgiving, yet we must steel ourselves and secure the survival of our race through the unflinching pursuit of science and technology.
- Stellaris
sometimes barely though, lol
thank youNo worries I've replied.
you guys have never encountered the "son of a bitch" brand of ESI probably. I have. It equaled being driven by personal feelings projected as "character traits" onto others and Se used for the purpose of promoting those. I agree that in abstracto Se and Fi makes for an intriguing paradox, but only if you understand Fi as "values". Which is maybe the most evolved form of Fi. I found this description good:
White (introverted) ethics This is the subjective relationship between two carriers of potential or kinetic energy that shows the level of attraction (or repulsion) between one object or subject and another object or subject. Thanks to this IM element a person feels which objects attract him and which repel him. You might say that this perceptual element conveys information about objects' need or lack of need of each other and about the presence or absence of mutual or one-way needs.
Such an individual perceives information about this facet of objective reality the individual perceives as a need for certain objects that satisfy physical wishes/desires, psychological or spiritual desires, and a need for other people — in other words, a person's wishes/desires and interests that are directed toward animate and inanimate objects. This includes feelings of like and dislike, love and hatred, the desire to obtain some thing/object, etc., and greed or the absense of greed. The higher feelings of this kind can be called ethical, because relationships between people's needs are mainly regulated by ethical normals.
When this perceptual element is in the leading position, the individual possesses the innate ability to perceive and evaluate wishes/desires — both his own and others'. He always knows who wants what from whom. He is able to set his awareness of subjective reality and his wishes in opposition to those of others. He has the ability to mould and perfect both his own and others' wishes. He possesses both the ability to provide himself with necessary relationships with others and confidence in his capacity to influence other people. His correct perception of human needs allows him to avoid risky collisions when satisfying his own needs. This engenders the ability to manipulate people's attachments, and the ability and desire to influence people's ethical feelings and bring these feelings closer to societal ideals.
As for the type of ESI whose Fi struck me as totally "unethical" compared to what one would expect a feeling type to be, it looked kind of like this: Attachment 3565
I don't think you're EII... Constructive, I knowyeah, my dad is both a very sensitive person and a very decisive person with an "edge" to him
when you see Fi and then Se - it's like seeing a walking contradiction of sorts
lol, I'm all kinds of things now
Some sort of introverted Alpha. Probably an SEI > LII
Sooo LSE. Stereotypical "workholic businessman" variety. Ni-PoLR as fuck, esp when it comes to Fe matters (can't read causality and how an emotional circumstance that affects you someone in the past can change things in the future, etc.) Bad at reading people. Judges people arbitrarily, and seems to think all personality traits are circumstantial (i.e. "This white guy is kinda sleezy- it's b/c he moved to China and China makes Americans sleezier.")
3w2 so/sp.
I am so surprised that he didn't follow his saying with "it does! It's true"hahaha
-
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
LSEs are some awfully virile motherfuckers aren't they
my dad was a very obvious alpha LII.
i used to think LSI but his personality has changed since he left the military, he is now a lot more jovial. Thus I don't know anymore. Positive traits: a very positive and optimistic person, very orderly, coscentious and precise. Negative traits: very worried about time, always half an hour early to appointments; not good at managing money in a profitable way (often too optimistic or stereotypical).
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
My Dad, an LII to the last.
IEI Dads don't exist, huh?
LSE or LSI
IEI dads don't exist.
Projection is ordinary. Person A projects at person B, hoping tovalidate something about person A by the response of person B. However, person B, not wanting to be an obejct of someone elses ego and guarding against existential terror constructs a personality which protects his ego and maintain a certain sense of a robust and real self that is different and separate from person A. Sadly, this robust and real self, cut off by defenses of character from the rest of the world, is quite vulnerable and fragile given that it is imaginary and propped up through external feed back. Person B is dimly aware of this and defends against it all the more, even desperately projecting his anxieties back onto person A, with the hope of shoring up his ego with salubrious validation. All of this happens without A or B acknowledging it, of course. Because to face up to it consciously is shocking, in that this is all anybody is doing or can do and it seems absurd when you realize how pathetic it is.
So I take it you won't be having kids. Sorry about that.
Ti - LSI 6w5cp sp/sx
Not the most mysterious person to figure out
IEI's should not procreate
picsTi - LSI 6w5cp sp/sx
Not the most mysterious person to figure out
IEI's should not procreate
@AshSun
daddy's or mine?
I think a video would work better for you. Pics with your father, of course. Lately I kind of have a thing for older guys.
@AshSun but he's like really old50+. He was very handsome when younger. But he is very paranoid about internet security (or any security really
yeah-yeah. I bet he looks like Putin and you don't want us to know.@AshSun but he's like really old(Putin is probably not Ti sub, despite what Sociofficials say)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
