she's made a lot of videos on socionics - does anyone know her from this site? any guesses as to her type from the videos?
she's made a lot of videos on socionics - does anyone know her from this site? any guesses as to her type from the videos?
ESE?!
Based on the content of her videos, she is implying she is IEI...
She says she IEI, but her Fe is of the Mobilizing kind. Therefore ILE. I mean, she writes:
"Strongly emotional and they express their emotions easily. Are coquettish, enticing, and dress with taste. The aesthetes in relations, they value good manners. Know how to provoke their partner's initiative. Usually remain diplomatic but sometimes become capricious, exacting and easily agitated, however they are easily appeased. Love sexual games and prolonged preparations."
But this is what we see in real life:
Dress with taste? ....
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
Her mannerism is a bit masculine to me. The way she sits with her legs spread apart in particular. Her laugh too, something about it seemed like she was holding back her laugh or at the very least tone it down or soften it.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
her outfit makes me want to wear baggy pants forever. cuz her ass is munching on those tights. (and mine probably does too without me realizing it).
for her type: EXXX seems likely.
I am trying to watch the rest of the video but I find myself wanting to yell, "more ale, wench!"
gonna have to listen without the visual...
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I cut the video where she wears that elegant outfit after just 30 seconds...
Her style is ... incredible
Such elegance.
Why am I watching downton abbey :/
It's difficult to tell, because she's wearing glasses. I think along the lines of Alpha irrational, most likely SEI. A very excited one, that is.
ETA: some of the mannerisms are actually very ILE, but there is a authenticity in the emotional expression that makes me think she can not be ILE.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
Guys, you know she probably reads the forum. No need to say hurtful shit.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
Is this really how IEI 4w3 looks like?! I'm not trying to be offensive, just don't get the vibe...seems waay agressive to me. I would type her ILE.
Well I hope she doesn't think I consider her a wench then. My automatic association is with a certain way of accentuating the breasts that make me think of peasant girls or pirate chicks. It was nothing against her specifically. I don't care what people wear unless we are bonded by love and/or friendship, then we have this unspoken agreement to be honest with each other about certain things. I have pics of some of my questionable "elegant" wardrobe choices that would rival a hooker or a vampire.That is not directed to her since she did NOT conjure up images of hookers or vampires in me.
Maybe it is my masculine side that notices how breasts are presented. Now I feel a little bad since I do not want to hurt feelings.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Hey, my comment was about pants. her pants. and all pants.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
watching her videos i had a hard time believing her self-typing and wanted to see if anyone here knows her or has talked to her to give their feedback.
what made you conclude that she has mobilizing Fe? the slip-ups in dressing style could be Si or Se polr of rational intuitive types.
How about EII? She could be an Fi user
Most of you don't even know for a little bit what an IEI looks like.
I'm embarassed...
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
The OP:
She's a sensory type.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Oh, yes. Determination is everything. The vision is more than enough to motivate me most of the time.
Its not like an IEI needs to use to the same extent (or the same way) as an SLE. We just need enough to get by. Both types have willpower enough, just completely different approaches to utilising it. An IEI does not need turned on all the time to achieve long term goals. An SLE would be impossibly sidetracked if they engaged their for more time than they needed it.
Honestly I have only imagined how being self-dualized would manifest in me and haven't really considered how it might manifest in others. I really don't have a desire to experience the world much different than I already do.
----
RE: Videos
I finally watched the EII - IEI video above and she said some things that I can relate to but then other things seemed to be reversed from the descriptions I read online. Her ability to present so much information on the fly was impressive even though I don't know enough about socionics to say if it was technically correct. She seemed confident and could monologue pretty well without the need for someone to ask her questions. I am not as confident in my ability to present so much information in a verbal form without going off on unrelated emotionally fueled tangents.
There is one thing I may have totally misunderstood. Did anyone else hear her say Adolf ****** was an IEI?
I am overtired so I may have heard her wrong.
Last edited by Aylen; 05-10-2014 at 06:58 AM. Reason: sp
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I did not finish the video but Adolf is commonly considered as INFJ in MBTI.
@kadda1212 would you mind to enlighten us and make us know what does an IEI look like please?
I feel guilty for having embarassed you.
I really do not get the IEI vibe from her, at least visually
But we probably shouldn't rely on VI this time..
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
Just wanted to say, that I'm not doubting her IEI status based on her appearance whatsoever, only her agressive, assertive energy.
"Female IEI is the embodiment of the conventional ideas of femininity. Yet, she still seem so sensitive, brittle, and defenseless to the point that it would make any man want to instantly protect her."
I mean, this is obviously exaggerated, but I think there is something to it...or not ?
Yes, you shouldn't rely on VI. I know, she's IEI, because I've spoken to her several times. I can relate to many of the things she says, also in her videos.
She draws a really good picture of what an IEI is like in her videos. So, you should watch those if you want to get enlightened.
she's dumb and embarrassing, whatever type she is. NTR.
@Kadda No, wait, isn't VI the only reliable and most important thing to rely on especially when you have no idea who the person is?
I thought making comments on the boobs and butt of someone was the most intelligent way to type! What did I get wrong?
These people exhude knowledge, I'm really curious how far they go
PS. I'm also highly impressed by the defenselessness and brittleness in the comments of Aylin and Darya.
Brittleness? I'm just trying to explain my comments in case they seemed offensive, cause they weren't meant that way. If you're going to put yourself on the internet, you can expect some negative feedback. She seems like a self-confident girl, so I don't think she cares that much. But I agree some comments were.mean and unnecessary.
Edited: I'm sorry I'm referring to you in third person
I like your explanation of Ni and Ni/Ne comparisons btw