I don't think you are ILI... you have an entirely different vibe. I'd say IEI, SLI are much more likely.
Interesting:
IEI = 3
ILI = 1
SLI = 1
LSI = 1
SEI = 1
A lot of choices =>
I am open to everything.
This used to be a questionnaire.
Last edited by Persephone; 05-05-2014 at 04:53 PM.
I see nothing inconsistent with LSI. Other than that, you're stunning.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
Creating internal harmony is very consistant with base.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
Well, thanks! There was one photograph of you that gave me an SLI vibe, and that's the overall vibe I get from this video.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
It's easy to explain, but difficult to do it in a way that will serve as a proper positivist argument. But let me try anyway.
As I said, it's a matter of vibes, and these vibes evoke certain transference effects in me (ask your psychoanalyst about it, most psychoanalysts love this concept of transference). Or in plain English: these vibes remind me of other people in the past, and more specifically, people I have identified as SLIs. In general SLIs trigger (in close interaction) a response in me to start taking care of their emotional well-being, to take away the sorrow of their loneliness, a problem they can't solve on their own. To put it in Socionics terminology: your Mobilizing Function (Fi) triggers my Creative Fi. I have explained this in some of my blogs:
http://mavericksocionics.blogspot.nl...-function.html
http://mavericksocionics.blogspot.nl...-creative.html
http://mavericksocionics.blogspot.nl...n-by-ilis.html
This is as good as it gets. If I were to know you in real life, I would probably be capable of providing a better argument which would be more convincing.
LOL, but just by itself, not very type related ;-)
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
Interesting.
I know what transference effect is, I studied psychology a bit.
The term of sorrow bothers me a bit... and technically I am OK to be alone.
This is worth digging, thanks for links, will take a look at soon.
There is a huge chance I will get to chat with Meged in the near future. If you are interested, I will post the outcome and we will see if you were right about my vibes
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
Thanks.
I am tired as hell, you are right, and no make up = zombie face, expressions and voice.
Also nothing to emote about and usually am louder than that, especially with people I know.
Videos are definitely not the natural disposition to expect from me, that's for sure... But politeness is prio in any case, just part of my education.
I am open to everything you know, I won't stop on a type just because I like the description or because it seems cool.
Just need to process a bit of information, I am not very experienced in socionics. Not yet
Meged: http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...Meged-Ovcharov
IEI is my personal opinion.
...
Last edited by Persephone; 06-08-2014 at 07:59 PM.
"Didn't put make up, and am underslept."
A bit cruel.
"I almost died .... once. Yeah." How more factual can one get?
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
People overtype women as Fe and Fi types, and especially pretty women. I think you're a Ti type, personally. But there isn't a ton to go by here so that's only an impression so far. But LII or LSI maybe? If I'm wrong about Ti, then I'd think introverted Te type, so ILI or SLI. I agree with whoever said you seem to value Ni so maybe LSI before LII.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
Hmm, the more you post, perhaps you could be LII after all. I'm leaning between that and IEI. There's a girl at work that I thought was ILI at first but am starting to think she may be my dual after all. Very shy and not talkative at all, but I can always get her to laugh at one of my stupid jokes.
Anyway, it's possible you may be LII as I see a lot of analysis in your posts, lots of Ti. IEI is still a consideration as you seem to be reflecting more and introspecting, which can seem typically Ni in they way you do it, but I think it's because you're just trying to tell stories and talk about your past so that people know who you are.
I wouldn't consider LSI for you as others have suggested, as I'm not really seeing any Se from you at all. You're not pushing people are exerting authority, but rather that seems like a weakness of yours. Also, an LSI wouldn't lose their phone 10 times in a day and be that out-of-touch with the physical world. I think clues like that clearly point to being intuitive in general.
I actually think ESI after watching the videos... am I the only one?
@blackburry @lungs
Edit: immediately not sure anymore... but some kind of sensor.
From her video... I'm leaning towards IxTJ perhaps IXTP...if behaves slightly more relaxed when not on cam.
Definitely logical and probably introverted. I think it's between LSI, ILI and SLI.
I wonder if you could be ESI.
I am going with definite ISFx
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Tons of similarities + an uneasy "will never really bond/there's always gonna be friction" kind of feeling usually points towards my quasi-identical. I am also willing to consider Ti-LII here, but I really like the LSI typing the best.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
I forgot my keys tonight while buying some food in a supermarket. I felt so idiot in front of my car, looking for those always disappearing keys.
Pardon my French, but I noticed that you have a huge crush for XSFX. Can it be some form of biais?
Me being Fi dom is as much possible as a fish rain.
But thank you.
If that was a hidden compliment, I take, make a nice smile and say thank you.
I am blocked as hell in front of cam
A lot of stuff to consider, thank you.
I do bond, but very rarely.
Ok I filled the 14 page questionnaire and sent it to Meged. Normally I will have a video typing session with her soon, so I will inform you all about the outcome.
If you are interested, of course