I may have posted this somewhere or even in this thread before.. But it's perfect for sp/sx. The video.
Poor tact in social situation is very much so last.
Not wanting to be personal in interviews is not related to instinct.
I seemingly have more experience than you and i go more by vibe and she def vibes so last. Being born into the kardashian family does not make you so first.
Are other sp types strangely soothed and satisfied by this or no?
http://roomhole.tumblr.com
I'm sp-last, and pictures of rooms do nothing for me. I see rooms as places to keep out the weather and to use temporarily for some specific purpose. A tent in a field would work as well.
(Being sx-first, I instead collect pictures of interesting women in a "Babe" directory on my computer.)
I do find it interesting that sp-firsts focus on housing and shelter. The fact that you think it is sp-related, @lungs, might explain a lot of things that puzzled me about my sp/so ex. When we went on our honeymoon, she chose to stay at the Drake Hotel in Chicago. The room looked totally pimped out to me, and I was anxious to get out and do things and see the sights. She, on the other hand, wanted to luxuriate in the frilly bed amid the draperies, uncomfortable chairs, and weird wallpaper.
More recently, I'm re-doing (rebuilding, really) my house. Large parts of it are torn out to the studs, but I had a friend and his wife visit, and so I pushed to have the guest bedroom and the bathroom finished for their stay. The ex brought her sister over just to see the new bathroom. It was like I didn't exist.
I don't particularly like those pictures @lungs
I think Rose McGowan (<3) is sp/sx.
Having a porn folder is not just an sx first thing. I bet that could be proven with a simple hard drive check. lol
I liked a couple of the pics in that link, others not so much. They reminded me of horror movies where bad things happen. I got chills on the back of my neck.
This one is pretty cool. Didn't creep me out.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
@lungs what in the world are these claustrophobic monstrosities?
My conception of sx is pretty much the opposite of the mechanical objectification of other people.
You find the pictures on that blog "luxurious and pimped out?" the kind of place someone would want to relax on a vacation? Weird.I do find it interesting that sp-firsts focus on housing and shelter. The fact that you think it is sp-related, @lungs, might explain a lot of things that puzzled me about my sp/so ex. When we went on our honeymoon, she chose to stay at the Drake Hotel in Chicago. The room looked totally pimped out to me, and I was anxious to get out and do things and see the sights. She, on the other hand, wanted to luxuriate in the frilly bed amid the draperies, uncomfortable chairs, and weird wallpaper.
I prefer to go out and do things as well.
I guess this is what qualifies as luxurious and pimped-out, supposed to be a room at the Drake: http://d2zy10gslnidpn.cloudfront.net...a-_Bedroom.jpg
No likey.
I'm seriously into interiors and architecture, and functional design more generally. I even like a certain amount of decay and grossness. On vacation, some time in a motel room is fine (though going out is more the point), and I like the feeling of having only a few things tucked away in a suitcase and arranged here and there. It feels light. I also feel that way on airplanes, unburdened and removed from everyday concerns.
The actual room we stayed in at the Drake might have been a Honeymoon Suite, I don't remember, but the ex was excited about it. It had a higher-seeming ceiling, was not rectangular (as I remember) and had more drapes and stuff. It was just loaded with junk.
Same. I like things which are both beautiful and functional, with a minimum of excess. I also like to travel light.
Eh, as Aylen mentioned, having a folder labelled Babe doesn't indicate sx-firstness ; it does remind me of Se-valuing that I'm seen in Gamma victim males.
Also, this is completely inappropriate but I have read posts where you referred to your wife and I feel a little infatuated with her , I mean she is my socionics dual (Te-SLIs are rare :'( ). Kidding. Ahem.
Same here. I like to photograph them from outside. But to think of living there... naaah. It's not instinct, it's rather a learned sense of hygiene.
Here's some of my pictures that have a bit of that shroudedness / abject / penetration / cold, dark quality to it. (That is not to say that I don't like lighter ones too, still, even with those I don't enter the social realm, they don't get crowded, I keep the observer's view.)
Last edited by Neokortex; 07-27-2016 at 07:35 AM.
Except for impaired empathy, an ordinary guy who's looking for down-to-earth, loving, loyal friends and a geeky, warm, voluptuous girlfriend!
I didn't say I want to live in those places. I'm never typing or speaking another word in my life bcuz the meaning will just get made up jfc
Oh, and about the YT videos... too much popular artists, actual, contemporary music, what we have as current fads, electro sounds, singing style. That's anything but social blind spot.
And on top of that arguing about a celebrities type? Aren't we supposed to talk deeply to each other instead?
Except for impaired empathy, an ordinary guy who's looking for down-to-earth, loving, loyal friends and a geeky, warm, voluptuous girlfriend!
Nah, definitely not so first haha. Hes barely hanging out with friends ever, nor does he seem to care. sp/sx. He doesnt go out, he uses grindr for all the people he hooks up with, and them says byebye and never talks to them again when its done, very sp/sx
Actually now that I think about it, the sp/sx I know also love their dating apps/sites. It makes sense, social last and contraflow. Easiest way to meet their spsx needs without all the social small talk etc.
Last edited by maniac; 08-14-2016 at 06:49 PM.
Ghost, if you come across social stuff like this, I wonder whether you're another so/sx wanting to be an sx/sp.
I agree, though, I haven't even watched the video. The bright colors, the strong facial expression, the BIG text. Even Sp/Sx people don't push it all in your face like that. I tried tinder but as soon as I got on and tried the functions, I erased myself promised to never come back. It's that can of worms effect of too much people, too much trash around, no real sense of isolation.
Except for impaired empathy, an ordinary guy who's looking for down-to-earth, loving, loyal friends and a geeky, warm, voluptuous girlfriend!
Come across what? I'm definitely sx/sp. "another so/sx" what does that even mean? Elitism much?
Also I don't understand why someone would want to be sx/sp it's probably the worst stacking, "unfortunate belonging". Want to be involved with people, around people, but suck at it because soc last.
He is sp/so 7w6, done. Probably 739.I agree, though, I haven't even watched the video. The bright colors, the strong facial expression, the BIG text. Even Sp/Sx people don't push it all in your face like that. I tried tinder but as soon as I got on and tried the functions, I erased myself promised to never come back. It's that can of worms effect of too much people, too much trash around, no real sense of isolation.
So, I'm like incredibly one note because I've been posting this video like everywhere, BUT, I thought the sp/sx forum was usually a little too dark and I wanted to contribute something warmer and sweeter to it.
David and Hugh have a pretty charming life; they travel a lot (they stay in certain locations for long periods of time between travels) and they seem to make friends and meet interesting people (sx-creative?). Sedaris is also a very dedicated writer (pursues in passions in a solitary-ish way, sp/sx-ish).
David Sedaris is sp/sx and I think his partner, might be sp/so. This is a really beautiful look into what sp love often is: consistency, fidelity, domesticity, practicality (having a well kept home, that Hugh maintains and David is very appreciative of), dedication.
There is something very sp/sx in David's attachment to Hugh, like Hugh could abuse him or whatever but David could never leave him because it would mean having to go out in the greater world and let me tell ya, certain aspects of dating are really unpleasant for us, social lasts, meh. Also ... very sweet but not necessarily sp: the fact that while Hugh doesn't have the sexxxeh voice that David thought his partner would have had when he was younger, Hugh has more important qualities which David prioritizes and adores <3 .
Melanie Martinez- sp/sx 749
Last edited by maniac; 10-24-2016 at 06:35 PM.
Man, watching this video was an experience. I hated everything about her, from her red tatoos to her quirky "uniqueness" to her twitching body movements to her irritating voice to the lame lyrics. I kept looking for something, anything, that I could like, and kept failing to find it.
This is very rare for me. I usually like sx/sp and sp/sx, so it must be something else.
Also, not very relevant, but I tend to feel comfortable around sx/sos. I once read about an so/sx talking about so/sps were people were they felt most comfortable around because they never mind it when so/sxes are like, 'hey, let's go out with other people' . With sx/sos , it's like HOMG you have my edge and you are so open about it or that's exactly what I'm thinking about not saying; they're a blast when we click .