Hammers see nails everywhere. Are you sure you wish to present yourself as a nail?
Hammers see nails everywhere. Are you sure you wish to present yourself as a nail?
Are you refering to socionics or the betas as being the "hammers" here?Originally Posted by InvisibleJim
I'm referring to the typing people.
Sometimes you get banged other times you get nailed...
sorry SSA, I couldn't help myself. Forgive me?
Tra la la la trollin', I am...yoda style!
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Ahh well, don't worry. Typology is only a hobby for me. I think both the MBTI and socionics are actually quite invalid (but fun) tools in determining the nuances of your personality.
That said, introspection does next to nothing for me, since my understanding of myself can change depending on my current mood and situation, so I guess I'll have to rely on other peoples opinions on this, since I am quite unreliable. The problem is not really that I don't understand myself though, but rather that I don't understand myself in the system.
I'm being banged and nailed!? Stop treating me like a piece of meat! I HAVE FEELINGS YOU KNOW!?Sometimes you get banged other times you get nailed...
sorry SSA, I couldn't help myself. Forgive me?
Tra la la la trollin', I am...yoda style!
Seriously though, your comment made me laugh.
Heh, I am delirious. I only had a couple hours sleep because of a WEIRD dream... which is reflected in this post.And our credo, "Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc"..."We gladly feast on those who would subdue us". Not just pretty words.
Wednesday, play with your food!
[Please feel free to troll my threads whenever you want. This is a notice of my explicit agreement to being trolled. You will face no retribution.On that note "Free Absurd 2014". The Passion is Real!]
Last edited by Aylen; 04-09-2014 at 02:34 PM.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Yeah, one of these weird metaphors that I never really understood the logic behind (Who would have sex with a piece of meat?), but always found funny.
Heh, I am delirious. I only had a couple hours sleep because of a WEIRD dream... which is reflected in this post.
[Please feel free to troll my threads whenever you want. This is a notice of my explicit agreement to being trolled. You will face no retribution.On that note "Free Absurd 2014". The Passion is Real!]
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Yeah, riiight??? Sounds unsanitary. You might get mad cow or something.
Edited to unstick that from my head.
Last edited by Aylen; 04-10-2014 at 11:06 PM.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Right, to get this thread back on track, I'd say that the possible types, thanks to great analysis (Especially by Park) have been narrowed down to EII & IEI (And I will personally include ILE as well, just to be sure. I have been typed as that quite a few times in the past).
So my next question would be: How should I move on from here? Should I answer some more questions in either written form, or in a video? Or is there a third or fourth option?
I believe I already answered that.
In other words, give it time.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
If you like fiddling with tests, check out this cool Sociotypograph.
If you feel like getting "deeper," given your theoretical inclinations, you can go back to the roots and find Jung's original contributions. Get familiar with his research, read his original cognitive functions definitions and observations, and see where this all began. Then you could investigate the Russians and how they came up with Socionics.
Btw, ILE seems unreasonable for you because you've expressed confidence in dealing with inter-personal matters and being attentive to personal ethics and moral attributes, which goes directly against Fi PoLR.
Last edited by Park; 04-11-2014 at 11:08 PM.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Ah yes, I must have missed that. Thank you! So basically I should try to understand the different types, and see which ones I would "naturally" get along with (Or just analyse the hell out of my friends, and see what types are presented there). And of course read more up on the theory (Though I wonder how much more is possible, since I've read quite a lot by now, even some original Jung).
Again, thanks for all the help. Appreciate it.
Well you know what I vote.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Maybe isfj. Introverted. Feeling.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
