In addition to EII I've considered LII, (IEE, ESI)
In the beginning I thought LII>EII because of a few tests and descriptions NBS made me take/read. Ever since I actually learned about the theory, I've felt confident about EII. I never self-typed as IEE or ESI, but I've analysed them as possibilities as so many other people have typed me as IEE/ESI in the past.
Overall, I feel like the three (mis)typings actually support my EII-typing rather well;
- 25% of them are Delta, 25% Alpha, 25% Gamma, 0% Beta. This makes Delta seem likely, as it's the opposing quadra for Betas (that got no votes) and also has characteristics from both Alphas & Gammas, being in the middle of them.
- I've been typed both as Ti/Ne dom and Ti/Ne polr; which makes me think I'm probably neither - people rarely get typed as their conflictor/supervisor/supervisee
- 2/3 of the types (IEE, ESI) suggest I'm ethical
- 2/3 of the types (LII, ESI) suggest I'm introverted
- 2/3 of the types (LII, IEE) suggest I'm intuitive
- 2/3 of the types (IEE, ESI) seem to suggest I have strong, valued Fi
- 2/3 of the types (LII, IEE) seem to suggest I have strong, valued Ne
--> EII all the way