Originally Posted by
Saberstorm
The failed logic was in his core concept - that batteries retain a negative charge ...
This was his reasoning: A battery starts with a +10 and -10 charge. The motor starts and it now has +9 and -10 charge ... so when the battery is dead, it should spin the motor or a generator backwards ... He spent months drawing sketches of this idea, showing everybody he knew the sketches. They all said polite things to him and then dismissed his ideas as totally wrong.
He then tried to make a battery recharger based on it. He was crestfallen after made it. It obviously did not work.
Why is that illogical ?? If the -10 charge has the power to attract a force +10, it would require an equal or greater force to separate +10 and -10. Thus the operation of the battery would itself require energy input. I do not know that much about electricity, but electrical currents operate machines with a drain on both positive and negative charges. The electrical current is polarized and the polarized charges make a "circuit" (as in loop) around the power grid wherein the charges are always balanced. I do not know exactly how that is done because I have not studied it, but both the + and - charges go away with the action of the battery. They are always symmetrical. The battery goes to +9 and -9 instantly.
That would appear to be Ti because it is axioms (equal force / greater force / symmetry / unity and so on) rather than the actual algorithm (in detail) has to how that works. Anyway, his ability to do Ti is very limited. He uses Te without any balancing Ti.
An SLI would have 4D Ti and should easily grasp ideas like abstract symmetry in electrical devices.
I think he is very creative. I think he has plenty of imaginative ideas. They are not often logical. They fail on the logic, not the imagination. I seem to get along pretty well with him but I often have to correct him. I do not enjoy correcting him. The logic of his original ideas are flawed.