Originally Posted by
Marietta
that view is interesting and a bit contradictory for me. According to socionics different types' representants are subjected to the same patterns of intertype relationships. At the same time, according to some descriptions Fi ego types are supposed to be better than others in establishing relationships and connections in action. If particular relationships depend on intertype rel. patterns anyway and things work out naturally or they don't, how could an Fi ego be better at influencing this when e.g. approaching incompatible types? or is it only about being more insightful, selective and aware of who is compatible and the nuances and nothing more...not really that much of an active ability?