Are you suggesting he is, my dual (SLE), semi-dual (SEE) or mirage (ILE). I see my mirage and semi above...I spot them anywhere...How come I got to come up with examples? I am not even reading all the posts so I do not know what you want examples of.Originally Posted by Absurd
I know my socionics
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Reading what isn't there is established IEI trait, it seems. I've got a magic marker, yay.
No, Charlie, points towards your expertise in some matters and I want to see myself.
Okay.I know my socionics
Aylen, what type are you? I have to add you to my list.Are you suggesting he is, my dual (SLE), semi-dual (SEE) or mirage (ILE). I see my mirage and semi above...I spot them anywhere...How come I got to come up with examples? I am not even reading all the posts so I do not know what you want examples of.
I know my socionics
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I self type IEI within the confines of this forum. I have others say, SEI, EIE, EII, IEE but that is another matter of perception. I guess I am whatever people say I am that and so much more.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
hehehe. Ok. I'll add you in as IEI so far thanksI self type IEI within the confines of this forum. I have others say, SEI, EIE, EII, IEE but that is another matter of perception. I guess I am whatever people say I am that and so much more.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
