Fair enough.
What does it have to do with anything I have wrote so far? Nothing?Thanks, I thought so too. After all, I define "Ne" as "Explicit Field/Condition/Construct Statics".
Yes.[/COLOR]Yes/no?
(Problem is, you're giving me attention now and you get me oh so confused now, that is, I am starting to think I am supervising you now. Help out a brother here, who doesn't read Morning Start and can't stand being called a brother).
It is the act of producing thoughts, which in your case means you have a problem and I am here to profit from your problems.What would "to think" mean?
The act of assumption again, eh?Assuming I'm right (which I'm probably not), you can do me one better: you can conflict with him. I'm starting to wonder if you're ESI; if so, I urge you to antagonize woof as much as possible.
Come on, Charlie Sheen, it is time you castaway your hypotheses, you're starting to sound liek a hypothetical person already.
Let me summarise: first EII, then EIE, now ESI. God damn, Sheen, I mean Charlie, purchase yourself a nice lightning conductor and whenever you have a thought, let it strike it. As for conflicting woofl, hell yes I will do, after I am finished with you. Rhyming with Absurd made easy, you just need to pull the trigger and squeezy.