are there correlations?
are 2s especially giving? 8s especially dominant? etc etc etc
2's give the best oral
3's have wide range of refined skill set
4's most creative sadomasochism
5's grotesque power contraptions
6's great at mixing it up- hot then cold, dominant then weak
7's best at loving/sexing you... so that you can love/sex them!
8's perfect for those who lack initiative
9's make the pleasure so good that you forget that they are there
1's always ready to give/experience it in tight or strange orifices
j/k
Actually, I wonder how instinct stackings play in bed...
I've read online like... sx lasts saying that sex isn't about "intense merging" for them; like it's all about sheer physical pleasure or some sort of companionship feeling. Some sx-lasts I know in real life actually give me vibes of being asexual.
W/ so-last I imagine sx/sp and sp/sx to be different...? Like sp/sx be more focused on the subjective feeling the emotionally interactive aspects parts of sex were bringing, and sx/sp more focused on the sustaining the mutual charge. I think with sp/sx I experience more of a "cut-off" feeling, like it's not about "us" ultimately, maybe more about what we are helping each other experience side by side.
I'm sp-last and sp should be that "physical pleasure" realm but I don't know how that would affect things since all people do sex for physical pleasure... do they not? I do remember when dating an sp/sx he would get very finicky and particular about positions, etc, and I didn't care and wanted to just be more in the moment/flow (and we were duals.) Is that sp-last?
Last edited by lemontrees; 03-06-2014 at 10:41 PM. Reason: just wanted to make sure that people knew I was kidding w/ the list at the top lol
ive been thinking about this. cuz my sp/sx instinct stacking is the thing i'm #1 most sure of.
being in the moment/flow is important to me. so i don't think sp-firsts are necessarily finnicky. but i still want to change something if it isn't working at all. i will compromise some awkwardness/buzzkill if it leads to getting off.
i don't really think of sex in terms of "merging," thats more a sometimes unfortunate byproduct of it lol.
there is a transcendant feeling, but its not necessarily about 2 souls finding eachother or whatever sx sort of thing. its almost more like a connection with nature, as stupid as that sounds, or a connection with the uncivilized part of myself. i don't want to say its more personal/individual because that doesn't really feel right. more like a connection with archetype? "side-by-side" sounds like a clinical way to describe it from my pov.
i believe this is true. matches up with my experience. sp types seem to have a certain way of doing things, habits, techniques when it comes to physical things and this seems to apply also to sex. this video makes me think of sp-last (shakira doesn't seem to be focused on her own body and not very 'precise' vs the guy)
1's will interrogate you about if you came or not in an attempt to be perfect
2's will want to help you get there
3's will be for public sex, otherwise it doesn't count
4's will have crazy kinks so that way they are a unique lay
5's will take notes on the mechanics
6's will swap back and forth from dominant to submissive, depending on the day
7's are most likely to be the straight up addicts
8's are the ones that punch you in the face during
9's will just do what you wanna do
Some quick associations... I don't know if they are technically correct though.
1's will take you
2's will take care of your needs
3's will take you to the limit
4's will take you to hell
5's will take you in the library, on a stack of books
6's will let you take them, eventually
7's will take you in a bathroom stall
8's will take you from behind
9's will take you to heaven
@lemontrees
@Whoobie77
heh you wrote the script...I am just following it.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Try with LSE, Eldanen.
I don't give a shit about enneagram but I like this thread.
“I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in — and the West in general — into an unbearable hell and a choking life. - Osama bin Laden
I heard that all enneagram types have sex. Is this true?
Thanks, good responses all.
Sexual 4 - Seeking Intimacy/Intensity
- Udit Patel "Infatuation (Ichazo's "Competition")"
Sexual Fours focus their envy and hypersensitivity in their intimate relationships. They are perhaps the most emotionally intense type of the Enneagram, which is both their gift and their potential downfall. They possess both a capacity and a desire for profound intimacy, and they derive tremendous insight into human nature through the ups and downs of their romantic lives. They have a sultry, sullen quality that can be attractive and mysterious, or at times, off-putting to others. Sexual Fours pour their energy and attention into the object of their affection, often becoming infatuated or even obsessed, sometimes after only one meeting. Sexual chemistry triggers their powerful imaginations, leading them to create enormous expectations of potential partners. Sexual Fours tend to be drawn to people who possess qualities and talents that they believe they lack. They want to complete themselves by associating or merging with the valued other. But this almost never works, so they may also end up envying and resenting their romantic partner for unintentionally reminding them of what they feel they are missing. In any case, Sexual Fours go through tremendous shifts of feeling about their loved ones—everything from idolization to unbridled hatred. Generally speaking, this type is aware of these feelings, including the dark ones, and finds ways to express them, sometimes in self-destructive ways.
http://theenneagram.blogspot.com/2007/09/type-4.html
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Last edited by Aylen; 04-11-2018 at 01:05 PM.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
7's and 8's are the shit
So I had amazing gay sex last night with an estp-s. The best part for me was when he sat on my face and stuck his balls in my mouth. He also looked down at me with this squinty eyed look of eightish aggression and dominance. I think part of the evening might have been motivated by my imbibement of tequila.
...b/c I have an unfortunately visceral imagination, I literally felt balls in my mouth when I read your post, and it was only about half a minute after that when I realized why my mouth felt so weird.
Mmmmhhhhh why not revive this one.
1s: Has never climaxed, has never done it with the lights on, or in any other position besides missionary. Needs alcohol first or feels too ashamed and dirty.
2s: Makes your fantasies come true so they can snare you into a relationship. Tendencies to poke holes in the condoms.
3s: Are so insecure about their performance that they can't get hard. They don't believe you when you say it's the biggest you've ever seen. Girls try to mimic pornos.
4s: They suggest trying tantric yoga sex, or kama sutra
5s: Virgins
6s: They have a routine they stick with
7s: Sex offender
8s: Great in bed, even the rape is pretty decent
9s: Not bad, not good
LSI-Se 836 Sp/Sx
My bf is 6w7 and he doesn't let me to blindfold him, because he doesn't like to lose control and he doesn't trust anybody (maybe somebody could chop his penis off while he's blindfolded : ). He reacts with even more suspicion to the idea of him being hand cuffed- it's a security risk for him and it's only him who can do it to others. So for 6's I'd say they're pretty authoratative, dominant and possessive in bed, but I really don't have a large sample : ).
Is there an actual sexual obsession with mirrors in psychology? Like a paraphilia. Or is it autoeroticism? The first article that showed up was with the same Christian Bale gif
Since we loooove dichotomies:
S: 8w7, 8w9, 7w8, 7w6, cp6w7, 3w4, 1w2, 5w6
M: 4w3, 4w5, 2w3, 2w1, 6w5, 6w7, cp6w5, 5w4, 3w2, 1w9, 9w1, 9w8
That's all
People are often the opposite of their personality in bed