Wow, @
Subteigh, not sure how to answer this. I wonder what your religious foundation is? I am curious about the source of your boldly presented misinformation, which bears the credibility of a Jack Chick tract, and sounds about that deep.
I can only tell you the truth: there is a far, far, more to all these subjects than you think. And it would help to keep in mind that people are not as stupid as you think.
It is perhaps a "J" vulnerability to make hasty judgments? Not sure what else could be going on with you. You have a lot of really bad, really wrong, really lame info that is so far off the mark. And you have made some powerfully firm indictments with it! You seem to have your conclusions all quite finalized, too.
You are completely wrong about the Dogma thing. It would help before you use that word to read up on what the Church considers to be Dogma. You did not.
As to Papal Infallibility, you should learn about it. Its a truly interesting subject. Even the relatively few corrupt, sinful Popes never once made a false Dogma or infallible statement*. Which would have been really bad, because when a Pope makes a truly infallible statement, according to the Church's clear definition of what papal infallibility is, then that statement is true FOREVER, on earth,and in Heaven, and
no future Pope can
ever say, "Oops, last year, or 500 years ago, when the Church said that, they were actually wrong on that." Or, "We've changed our minds on that one now. What the Church means instead is this..." No. Cannot ever happen. Once said, its forever, and that leaves every new Pope less "room" than the ones before it. Really confines creativity!
These things you think you know about and have the answers about you don't. If you want to know whats true, you should find out. But do go to a Catholic source to find out what Catholics really teach. It would be foolish to ask an angry atheist or a rabid anti-catholic what Catholics actually teach. Though, it looks like you already have.