What are you watching?

[Raver]

[Muddy]

[Muddy]

[xerx]

I read Peter Hitchens' blog every now and again.

I want to stress this: I have deep, fundamental disagreements with Peter Hitchens about almost every political issue. But if your looking for an intelligent layperson to articulate Conservative positions in a way that doesn't involve abstruse psychoanalysis, historically-illiterate rambling, or embarrassingly bad analogies with lobsters, he's a much better choice than Jordan Peterson.

[xerx]

Speaking of Peter Hitchens, I thought he got the better of Matthew Perry in this funny debate about drugs.





As someone who believes in decriminalization, I probably agree more with Perry, but it's hard not to admit that he looked like an insane alcoholic here -- probably because he is an alcoholic.

[Raver]

I read Peter Hitchens' blog every now and again.

I want to stress this: I have deep, fundamental disagreements with Peter Hitchens about almost every political issue. But if your looking for an intelligent layperson to articulate Conservative positions in a way that doesn't involve abstruse psychoanalysis, historically-illiterate rambling, or embarrassingly bad analogies with lobsters, he's a much better choice than Jordan Peterson.

I checked him out because I liked his late brother Christopher. They are similar in intelligence and mindset so I didn't regret it. I will be sure to check out more of him when I get the chance.