-
critique of dual relations
LOL...socionics is pretty screwed up when it comes to intertype relations. The idea is right but the theories are wrong.
Socionics dosesn't take into consideration subtype differences. And the J/P argument made by socionics is both wrong and right. Is right because the MBTI test are biased towards one subtype of a type. Socionics recognized something was wrong but ended up with the same bias but with the other subtype.
And like I mentioned earlier each subtype is different and have different needs in a mate.
For instance:
DUAL RELATIONS - Intuitive subtype:
dominant "N" = ENFP
less dominant "N" = ESFP
DUAL RELATIONS - logical subtype
dominant "T" = ESTP
less dominant "T" = ESFP
- there must be balance for a relation to work. If you are an intuitive subtype and you have a strong "N" function (N ~ 90 %) you won't be compatible with someone with a strong "S" function. A good example of this is Madonna (INTJ) and her husband (ENFP).
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules