Results 1 to 40 of 395

Thread: Socionics Tests

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Berlin
    TIM
    LSI 5w6 sx/so
    Posts
    5,402
    Mentioned
    144 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    right so I did it, but I actually had to force myself to choose an image very often. I didn't actually "prefer" it. I did it only to go on with the questions. How could the results be revealing of one's personality?! I'm sure this "branch" of Socionics is nothing more than fancy. And a while ago when I took that other test (colors only) I got Ego as leading TPE. Probably only because I'm into bright rich colors and I like strong contrasts.


    Introverted profile || Superego - Superid – Id – Ego

    The person who is characterised by the introverted profile is inclined to solitude, prefers a small circle of familiar people for socialising as well as for work and a well-known environment. Depending on what TPE is leading, the person balances his/her inner drives between responsibility for oneself and for others. The desire to think and to worry about himself/herself, the desire to protect the sensitive inner world from the destructive influences of the outside world with the need to protect and to care for other people as well as to allocate sufficient time and attention to their needs.

    Dominance - Superego
    Superego-types (Fyodor Dostoyevsky (EII), Theodore Dreiser (ESI), Maximilien Robespierre (LII), Maxim Gorky (LSI) - are the bright representatives of the psychic energy ‘Superego’ which is characterised by clarity, sincerity, purity of thought, wisdom, morality, intellectual and spiritual pursuits. Superego-types are law-abiding, honest and responsible. They tend to fulfil the assigned work as high as diligently as possible so that they do not feel shameful in front of the others. When tackling an assignment, they go the extra mile to make sure their result is perfect. The quality of their work is their source of personal pride and critical self-esteem. As a rule, they are quiet, reserved, hard-working people who know how to behave in any situation. There is obvious integrity in their views and consistency in their judgements and deeds. They assert high moral values, keeping up an established order that is important for social conservation.

    Support: Superid
    Superid-types - Sergei Yesenin (IEI), Honoré de Balzac (ILI), Alexandre Dumas (SEI) and Jean Gabin (SLI) - are the bright exponents of the ‘Superid’ psychic energy which is characterised by the strong imagination, mystery of the night, physical relaxation and emotional calmness. Superid-types do not have a goal to impose their will to others. They do not tend to manage others and control the situation but at their best they are able to adjust themselves and bring subtle changes to the environment.. Superid-types know how to create the relaxed atmosphere of nonintrusive communication, soft touch, humour and comfort. Superid-types find themselves often sinking into their inner world, which serves them as a source of inspiration and creation. Their inner world is fragile and mobile. They subtly respond to the slightest changes in the surrounding environment. Knowing the sensibility of its nature, Superid-types spend a lot of time in loneliness, philosophising and thinking about themselves, their needs and trying to protect themselves from the destructive influence of the outside world. They are very perceptive!

    Neutrality: Id
    Id-types - Aldous Huxley (IEE), Don Quixote (ILE), Napoleon I (SEE) and Georgy Zhukov (SLE) are the bright exponents of the psychic energy ‘Id’ which is characterised by a creative drive, changeability, flexibility, inexhaustible vivacity, and one’s potential whether apparent or hidden. Id-types are a source of inspiration for those who do not possess the power of optimism and zest for life. They share generously their interests and cheerfulness with others. Id-types are the people who occupy themselves with whatever is interesting and pleasurable to them. Their desires are variable, changeable, and adaptable to the current circumstances. Their main merit is that they can relatively quickly and without much effort get adapted to the new situation and switch from one activity to another if that is necessary. They are oriented to the external world and the things happening around them. As far as the world is full of various pleasures and wonderful events, their interest in life and willingness to enjoy new experiences remains much stronger than melancholy and short failures.

    Deficiency: Ego
    Ego-types - Hamlet (EIE), Victor Hugo (ESE), Jack London (LIE) and Stierlitz (LSE) -
    are the bright exponents of the ‘Ego’ psychic energy which is characterised by excitement and attraction, masculinity and sexuality, physical strength, courage and confidence – all the qualities desirable for strong leadership. Ego-types are hard-working, possess great will power and intend to change the order of the surrounding environment at their sole discretion. As a rule, they are somewhat presumptuous and would not like to admit their weakness in public. It is important for them to have a goal and to feel that they are ready to deal with any obstacles in order to achieve that goal. Ego-types are good at managing other people, making decisions, taking responsibility and not giving up on failures. Such people, as a rule, are good at projecting an aura of confidence and giving the impression of a serious, business people.

  2. #2
    Olga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Aylesbury
    TIM
    ESI
    Posts
    1,687
    Mentioned
    48 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Solaris View Post
    right so I did it, but I actually had to force myself to choose an image very often. I didn't actually "prefer" it. I did it only to go on with the questions. How could the results be revealing of one's personality?! I'm sure this "branch" of Socionics is nothing more than fancy. And a while ago when I took that other test (colors only) I got Ego as leading TPE. Probably only because I'm into bright rich colors and I like strong contrasts.


    Introverted profile || Superego - Superid – Id – Ego
    Solaris if you are into bright rich colours and like strong contrasts it is more about Ego- type. But you get a SEE on the colour test which is Id type. And leading Superego on the Pattern test. Two last results suggest leading statics and hence a static type. The pattern test also points to strong present of introversion.
    If we combine introversion and statics we get automatically the third basic feature - rationality. Statics+ introversion=rationality. The result coincide with the type stated in your avatar. You don't need to stick to one colour to validate a fancy branch of socionics. You test results did this for you.
    School of Associative socionics: http://socionics4you.com/

  3. #3
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Berlin
    TIM
    LSI 5w6 sx/so
    Posts
    5,402
    Mentioned
    144 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Olga View Post
    Solaris if you are into bright rich colours and like strong contrasts it is more about Ego- type. But you get a SEE on the colour test which is Id type. And leading Superego on the Pattern test. Two last results suggest leading statics and hence a static type. The pattern test also points to strong present of introversion.
    If we combine introversion and statics we get automatically the third basic feature - rationality. Statics+ introversion=rationality. The result coincide with the type stated in your avatar. You don't need to stick to one colour to validate a fancy branch of socionics. You test results did this for you.
    thnx for your feedback. From what I've seen you use subtypes in the form of "support TPE". I wonder ...in your theory could someone have a subtype from the same TPE category? --- for instance EII with ESI subtype or there would be too much incongruence due to "classic" Socionics aspects (such as polr vs creative)

  4. #4
    Olga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Aylesbury
    TIM
    ESI
    Posts
    1,687
    Mentioned
    48 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Solaris View Post
    thnx for your feedback. From what I've seen you use subtypes in the form of "support TPE". I wonder ...in your theory could someone have a subtype from the same TPE category? --- for instance EII with ESI subtype or there would be too much incongruence due to "classic" Socionics aspects (such as polr vs creative)
    Solaris, very good question. For the purpose of diagnostics in order to avoid confusion I consider subtype at the level of TPE- groups. It is possible to determine the subtype within one TPE group but it is not necessary. I explain why. We need to go back to the history of sub-type theories.

    Originally subtype was determined by either the first (programme) or second (creative) functions. This was a subtype within one TPE-group. LSI -Maxim Gorky type - ISTj either -LSI or -LSI.

    The -LSI was similar to LII and -LSI was similar with ESI. The profile within TPE Superego group could now days look like that: LSI -LII -ESI -EII or LSI - ESI - LII - EII.

    However, if we use the different TPE we can also determine the subtype by the first two functions. TPE -system is universal in this sense. If LSI has introverted (superego-superid) or static profile (superego-id) he has two possible subtypes with leading functions either (SLI-ISTp) or (SLE-ESTp). In this case you can say that this is - LSI. If LSI has rational profile then he has LSE as a subtype. LSE -ESTj has leading . This will be -LSI.

    But because the difference between the types in the same TPE group is minimal I omit the old system of subtypes. I consider the types within one TPE group similar enough because the share the same TPE-values. In terms of Jung terminology they have the same personality orientation: static rational introverts. But for the sake of interests you can always add this feature. You can say that LSI with subtype LSE is logical LSI while LSI with subtype SLI or SLE is the sensing one. The most interesting what you get is a psychodynamic profile which is only possible with different TPE. This is something new.
    School of Associative socionics: http://socionics4you.com/

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •