dichotomies
Tests by Gulenko: 72q (fan translated), 28q
Discordia's Test
Test by Meged - Ovcharov
8 functions
http://aimtoknow.com/test_beta
Test by Romanov (40q)
Test by Stepanov
Test by Zorin (TSA-90)
in Russian
Test by Gulenko
Test by Zorin (TSA-90)
Test by Romanov
Zurich test
http://www.socioclub.org/tests/
http://bolti.pythonanywhere.com/male (by Talanov) [not working]
Note: it's possibly to try a translator
Last edited by Sol; 11-15-2023 at 01:21 PM.
Making your MBTI code:
Introversion (I): 19 versus Extroversion (E): 4 Sensing (S): 7 versus Intuition (N): 12 Thinking (T): 14 versus Feeling (F): 4 Judging (J): 3 versus Perceiving (P): 18
I N T P
I know too much for it to mean anything, but ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Socionics non verbal test
http://socionics4you.com/post-4754?lang=en
Seems interesting, what do you get ?
Screenshot-2018-2-16 Socionics Nonverbal Test.png
to call this as picture test would be more correctly
Yes that's right + it would be more motivating for people to do, + it's very fun, though not sure of validity but it seems to work for most on a very low sample.Originally Posted by Sol
But i can't edit title apparently.
I got ILE
!!
There were some pictures of a relaxing cup of tea or something. I hate those picture, too clean and sterile. (But maybe they were supposed to be Si?)
My favourite picture was...
EDIT: I don't like pictures that are too "clean". Like a crystal blue ocean and white beach, photoshopped etc. There has to be enough variety in the impression to create "life" in the picture.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
I think we are supposed to only pick picture we like, meaning if you don't like any of the 2 you should just "Don't know" i did that just now and got IEE though haha.I got ILE
!!
There were some pictures of a relaxing cup of tea or something. I hate those picture, too clean and sterile. (But maybe they were supposed to be Si?)
My favourite picture was...
EDIT: I don't like pictures that are too "clean". Like a crystal blue ocean and white beach, photoshopped etc. There has to be enough variety in the impression to create "life" in the picture.
Yeah agreed that's why we got both Ne lead on this test.
Screenshot-2018-2-16 Socionics Nonverbal Test(1).png
That's what I did in the test. Only picked pictures I liked, but I could not help noticing some pics I didn't like
But I had the feeling that maybe the constructor of the test assumed that I would have liked pictures of relaxing cup of tea. But I didn't pick that.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
I think the test is not good for evaluating Si. Most of the art she associates with SLI is non Si related imo i.e...I got ILE
!!
There were some pictures of a relaxing cup of tea or something. I hate those picture, too clean and sterile. (But maybe they were supposed to be Si?)
My favourite picture was...
EDIT: I don't like pictures that are too "clean". Like a crystal blue ocean and white beach, photoshopped etc. There has to be enough variety in the impression to create "life" in the picture.
Most of these are Se,Ni valuing imo.
She also puts the art of Pablo Picasso in SLI but he was pioneer of Cubism which is basically a deconstruction of reality, to me is an obvious intuitive abstraction of reality so
Last edited by Faith; 02-04-2019 at 10:20 PM.
Yes Si is difficult to put into pictures. I agree those pictures seem more intuitive. Last year I posted some pictures of this artist whom I suspect might be SLI. I am not sure but I think the pictures express Si.
Pictures of nature and natural materials that carries the mystery of the Si experience. Sometimes reduced to the point that only the magical "nature impression" remains
https://www.google.fi/search?q=katar...ih=879#imgrc=_
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
LIE
could be worse
"Associative Picture Test"
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
I got IEI. The static and dynamic traits are pretty evenly distributed though (54% vs 46%)
“I want the following word: splendor, splendor is fruit in all its succulence, fruit without sadness. I want vast distances. My savage intuition of myself.”
― Clarice Lispector
LII (Introvert, Rational, Static, Logic, Intuition) - ILI subtype.
KEEP IT LIGHT AND KEEP IT MOVING
Thanks to this test I'm now going to the store to get some cheese and wine
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
I had to take it twice because the first time it was "undefined." probably because I chose "I don't know" too much. I wasn't a fan of a lot of them.
56% static
53% introversion
60% rationality
50% logic/ethics
63% sensing
This test was completely whack for me.
First I broke it...
Then I scored as INTx
Thanks for nothing and wasting my time socionics4u
I think picture test is silly. As much as text based tests are unreliable, how reliable can be picture test? I think the results will be pretty much random. Anyway, I haven't seen any reliable socionics test. I never scored as my type, and never even close to it. I think some good test should point me out in correct direction but they have been always showing that I am Te and Ni while I am clearly Ne and Ti. In this test I got LSI, what such a nonsense. The thing is that there might be different keys people might want to choose pictures, it really depends on subjective preferences. I was picking up pictures which are beautiful and not gloomy.
Too few genres and themes, some themes were portrayed more sympathetically (read: nothing visceral about a headshot of a woman holding a gun, there are better ways to portray that impulse) than others, no consideration given to one IE blocked with another comparative to a similar pairing (Ni + Te vs Ni + Fe, for instance), just isolated themes. From further reading, it appears to be based on temperament (TPE "Quadra" is just Ej, Ij, Ep, Ip). I found most of the images to be either bland or melodramatic, very little conceptual power in any of them, and picked strictly based on sub-1 second impulse, several times, and got the same result each time, for whatever that's worth.
I couldn't get myself to take the modern pictures seriously over the paintings... For some reason I just came into the test with the mindset that I'm trying to look for beauty, and there's no way in Hell the movie poster for Star Wars III is beautiful
I got this result Subtype TPE is not found. It is recommended to repeat the test again.
super delta ST
Type: Gabin, Superid
Subtype: Stierlitz, Ego
Profile: Dynamic
p . . . a . . . n . . . d . . . o . . . r . . . a
trad metalz | (more coming)
exotic Picture test by Olga Tangemann
http://socionics4you.com/post-4754?lang=en
A little unexpected result for me:
Type: Don Quixote , Id
Subtype: Jack London , Ego
Profile: Extraverted
Ok, I might be cognitive extraverted, but socially I'm not extraverted.
I guess I clicked on many pictures that shows an explorative theme, on less pictures with a contemplative theme.
the test told me the data I gave couldnt be typed (
Dear all, I have great news for you - I have published yesterday Nonverbal socionics test and it seems to work fine! Check it out but do not forget to register otherwise - no result.
Please leave your results here or at my forum.
I already had the nonverbal test “Patterns” to determine TPE Group and general psychodynamics. This is the first test of a future series of nonverbal tests to determine the type of personality based on the concept of associative socionics. I do not expect this test to be more accurate than the verbal tests in general. Its uniqueness lies in the fact, that this is it the first “visual” test of this kind, which does not require a lot of time and verbal evaluation. Test lays a new direction in socionics psychodiagnostics – nonverbal testing. This in itself a huge step forward since socionics ceases to be a “science of experts” and enters the boundaries of experimental science. Please, leave your comments and share your thoughts about it – this will help to improve the quality of the future tests.
Please, post your results here and do not forget to mention if it fits with your opinion of the type. I will also appreciate if you can share the link to the test in a wider social network- thank you!
http://socionics4you.com/post-4754?lang=en
http://socionics4you.com/smforum/ind...pic,655.0.htmlThis has been an issue for others too going back 3 pages. I got the same several times but finally got it to work. I see now new pics have been added so may take again. I got ILI on previous takes.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
http://aimtoknow.com/test/personality-test
Scored LII (LSI) on this one. I had never seen it before...
KEEP IT LIGHT AND KEEP IT MOVING
It gave me: "LIE or ILI"http://aimtoknow.com/test/personality-test
Scored LII (LSI) on this one. I had never seen it before...
I like the drawings of the types on that site.
These things almost always give me LII, ILI or ILE results. IEI once in a blue moon.
Took the extended Socionics test. I'm kind of happy that it gave me SEI-Fe1, because that's basically what I already considered myself. Overall everything fits right, except the secondary romance style of 'victim'. I wonder why it gives me that secondary romance style? If I have a secondary romance style, I'm pretty sure it would actually be the aggressor.
Capture1.PNGCapture2.PNGCapture3.PNG
Edit: Last night, I thought it over more carefully and actually I might feel more kinship with the childlike style. I like to be taken care of, too (). Maybe everyone does. But I still relate less to the victim style than the aggressor style, since I know who I like very quickly and I'm prone to pursuing them a little bit.
So I guess for me, caregiver > childlike > aggressor > victim.
And thanks @crAck for the explanation!
Last edited by Xaiviay; 08-14-2018 at 06:03 PM.
Oh, you mean how the % valuing are the same between duals? Or, did your result actually say that the strength of these funtions are the same? That would be very unusual in reality, I think o_O
From what I see from my result, it has two categories for each type, one that shows the % strength and the other shows the % valuing. The strengths are different for each type, but the valuing of the functions are the same.
Lol no worries, it's kind of a confusing graph for me, too.
Well, I think the idea is that those opposing elements directly complement and help each other. You can read some Ne/Si or Se/Ni (and Ti/Fe, Te/Fi) threads on here to get the gist. For example, Se covers the ability to impose one's will on the physical world, while Ni covers the ability to forsee the consequences of one's actions. From this you can see how Se without Ni can easily become destructive, and Ni without Se can be too passive. But together, they create wise and effective action.
It's harder for me to describe the Ne/Si dynamic in words, but I can definitely see how Ne benefits me and helps me use Si even better, when I manage to use it well (or have an Ne-base type helping me outthe best).
My test results vary greatly based on my mood. NF is nearly constant, though.
“I want the following word: splendor, splendor is fruit in all its succulence, fruit without sadness. I want vast distances. My savage intuition of myself.”
― Clarice Lispector
Not sure about the methodology, but it seems interesting, and it was fun to complete it.
Results
Type: Yesenin, Superid
Subtype: Huxley, Id
Profile: Irrational
Yesenin
The intuitive ethical introvert (IEI). The Dreamer. IEI often has feelings about the outcome of some actions or situation, being able to say whether the outcome is good or bad, but most of the time not able to explain why or what exactly will happen. Often they are lost in their dreams or thoughts, not noticing what is going on around them. They can influence the emotional atmosphere in a company of people, though the more people are present, the harder it is for the IEIs due to their introversion.
Huxley
The intuitive ethical extravert (IEE). The Mentor. IEE are naturally psychologists. They are able to build an opinion about a person very quickly and correctly. IEE enjoy helping people to expand their talents and encourage people to the self-growth and personal development. IEE have very good interpersonal skills and are able to find the individual approach to very different people. IEE are easily distracted, spontaneous, often have a spur-of-a-moment ideas. Their interests are broad and always changing being their life force. They looking for new experiences and wish to be in a new kind of situations and to be inspired by the new concepts. IEE see the multiple potential outcomes of a given situation and are able to hold them all in their head at the same time in order to see the essence of a situation. They see the hidden opportunities and can quickly find the way out of the problematic situation. While talking they often switch from one point to another ignoring the structure. IEE have a strong sense of morals and though they generally try to avoid a conflict, they would stand up for their opinion if their moral principals.
Stealing your method, @squark
TPE
42% - Dynamics
58% - Statics
14% - Extraversion
86% - Introversion
13% - Rationality
87% - Irrationality
Functional
43% - Logics
57% - Ethics
20% - Sensing
80% - Intuition
TPE graphics domination
11% - Ego
26% - Superego
37% - Superid
27% - Id
Does anyone know more about the TPE graphics domination chart? How does it work?
I’m ILI / LII on the images test.
LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”
Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”
LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”
I might be a pretentious art snob, but I found myself pressing the "don't know" option on the image test more than I would've liked to. I found most images pretty unappealing.
“I want the following word: splendor, splendor is fruit in all its succulence, fruit without sadness. I want vast distances. My savage intuition of myself.”
― Clarice Lispector
I was often making my choices as if it were a “which is less kitsch?” test, so yeah. The images that seemed to portray ethical scenarios were often very ... Hallmark-cards-like. And some of the bright color palettes and abstractions seemed unsophisticated, tho I love bright abstracts done well.
I mean no offense as it’s an interesting test, but I found my acquired aesthetic sensibilities probably overrode type-related values too often for the result to fit properly.
LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”
Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”
LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”
Attachment 13748 Attachment 13749
Type: Robespierre, super ego
Subtype: Balzac, superid
Profil: Introverted
Tests are fun. -w-b
With the picture test:
Type: Maxim, superego
Subtype: Zhukov, id
TPE: Static
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
