Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 81 to 83 of 83

Thread: The difference between Ne and Se

  1. #81
    Honorary Ballsack
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    3,354
    Mentioned
    110 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    The largest, most significant difference between Ne and Se is that one begins with the letter N and the other S
    Important to note! People who share "indentical" socionics TIMs won't necessarily appear to be very similar, since they have have different backgrounds, experiences, capabilities, genetics, as well as different types in other typological systems (enneagram, instinctual variants, etc.) all of which also have a sway on compatibility and identification. Thus, Socionics type "identicals" won't necessarily be identical i.e. highly similar to each other, and not all people of "dual" types will seem interesting, attractive and appealing to each other.

  2. #82
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,953
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    I've given you Se, Ne, and Fi now I'll give Te.

    So in the case of proceedural medicine where it's the procedure to triple check meds, the LSE is likely not to push back at the teacher. They may try but only with cause and affect in mind. So Te part will determine if the action is worth it. The negativist will see how the future is likely to play out. And, of course experience also steps in the calculation."If I push back it's likely that it will piss the teacher off, and me getting kicked out of class. I've seen it happen to me."
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  3. #83

    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    1,578
    Mentioned
    132 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
    This is the most embarrassing thread To me because I really see my stupidity here
    i find this post oddly endearing.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •