Results 1 to 40 of 187

Thread: Discussion of LSI-ISTj Subtypes

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Let's fly now Gilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    3w4 sx/so
    Posts
    24,684
    Mentioned
    95 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @ WP: I had an LSI-Ti English professor once, probably the most ideal example of this type I have ever encountered. He dressed well, was very eloquent and polite, and gave the impression that everything he did was "by the book;" once you got to know him, you realized it wasn't "the book" but rather "his book," but he just had that...sharpness about him, that you knew he wasn't messing around, that he was in-line somehow. I found his overal dispositon to be reassuring and fitting; from my impression of you, I think you would find him overly formal, probably somewhat retentive, and boring.
    But, for a certainty, back then,
    We loved so many, yet hated so much,
    We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...

    Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
    Whilst our laughter echoed,
    Under cerulean skies...

  2. #2
    JuJu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Springfield, Massachusetts, USA
    TIM
    EIE
    Posts
    2,703
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    In my experience, what's incorrect in the Meged translations of Ti-LSI are the words "correct," and "polite..." (Of course, anyone can be these things, but I have found Ti-LSIs to be just as likely to be the opposite.)

    For example, who among us would call Ti-LSI Dick Cheney "correct," and "polite?" He told an elected official to "fuck off" on the floors of congress. on the campaign trail, he called a journalist "a major league asshole." He shot someone and then allowed the victim to apologize to him, etc.

  3. #3
    Éminence grise mikemex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Third Planet
    TIM
    IEE-Ne
    Posts
    1,649
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by octopuslove View Post
    I don't know why - a tendency to label people they dislike into derogatory categories?
    It's the nature of the aristocratic preference. You understand people by placing them into categories.
    [] | NP | 3[6w5]8 so/sp | Type thread | My typing of forum members | Johari (Strengths) | Nohari (Weaknesses)

    You know what? You're an individual, and that makes people nervous. And it's gonna keep making people nervous for the rest of your life.
    - Ole Golly from Harriet, the spy.

  4. #4
    Creepy-male

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by octopuslove View Post
    How does that work in delta? Is it based on Fi then? (i.e. "this person abides by my moral code = good, this person is immoral = bad")
    I think the hinging point is Internal/External, actually. So labels are an external/objective/explicit thing, while choosing who to interact with is an internal/subjective/implicit thing.

    I think aristocratic Fi is having a sense for "I get along well with this group, or people in this group" or "I dislike this group or find this person to be disruptive". Socionics is interesting because it allows really clear groups to be formed and scripts alongside these for how to interact--for instance, "SLIs" or "Alphas" or what have you.

  5. #5
    Park's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    East of the sun, west of the moon
    TIM
    SLI 1w9 sp/sx
    Posts
    13,789
    Mentioned
    197 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by octopuslove View Post
    The LSIs I know are big fans of calling people "assholes", "douchebags", "cocksuckers", etc., though generally not to their faces. I don't know why - a tendency to label people they dislike into derogatory categories? I guess all betas will do that, but LSIs seem to do it reflexively.
    I do the same.
    “Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilly
    You've done yourself a huge favor developmentally by mustering the balls to do something really fucking scary... in about the most vulnerable situation possible.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •