Originally Posted by
JadaeRat
Wikisocion took it upon themselves to flip the original hypothesis on their very own, which I believe in this case was Jonathon, Expat, and Hotel Ambush.
I am readying from actual sources, not reworks.
The even admit to flipping them:
"As a result of "renaming" of this dichotomy by V. Gulenko, confusion arose. In A. Augustinavichjute [2] and G. Reinin [5] this dichotomy is called "left - right" (Leftists types are ILE, SEI, EIE, LSI, SEE, ILI, LSE and EII; Rightists types are ESE, LII, SLE, IEI, LIE, ESI, IEE and SLI). We utilized in this article the more contemporary "opposite" designations of V. Gulenko and T. Prokofieva (Leftists/Result types are ESE, LII, SLE, IEI, LIE, ESI, IEE and SLI, Rightists/Process types are - ILE, SEI, EIE, LSI, SEE, ILI, LSE and EII). As the names of the attributes do not determine the attributes themselves, the changing of the names is an insignificant detail, but still mentioned in case one encounters different classifications."
But the flip was WAS significant, which is why theyre ding dongs for taking this upon themselves to do to everyone, and why wikisocion is mostly a pet project gone chaotic.
Essentially, the original is Reinin and the rework is not.
"The Left – the right. The attribute reflects the fact that a type belongs to one of the two “rings of social progress.” The left "ring" is focused on the future and the potential opportunities of a situation; the right "ring" is focused on the past and on "summarizing of the results."
It has been also noticed that the division into eight 'left' and eight 'right' types corresponds to the lifestyles. In one case ('right' types) it is collectivism, communalism, in the other ('left' types) - individualism and, in extreme cases, asceticism. During the history of mankind there have been an equal number of all of these styles of life.
Recently I read a book by the remarkable Serbian writer, Milorad Pavic, Landscape Painted with Tea. It narrates about the monks of the Athon monastery. It turns out there is a clear distinction (among the congregation) between the so-called communals and hermits (or cenobites and idiorythmics as the author calls them). Each of the hermits had a cell and even a small hermitage; others lived together and had everything in common. These two tendencies have been parallel in history; just at times one or the other prevailed. The author of the novel speaks about this particular attribute, about the differences of the communal and the hermit styles of life.
These are definitely two different ways of life: there are people who can work only in a team, but others, on the contrary, work alone and alone only in the calm of an office. During the experiments the collectivists are quick to hear and understand the other members of the group" -Reinin
Fun times.