Ok, here's one:
ENTp vs. ESTp. Discuss.
Ok, here's one:
ENTp vs. ESTp. Discuss.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Rub my butt. Thank you!Originally Posted by Herzy
LOL!
Everyone touches my ESFp friend's butt cause it is rock hard. His butt gets around a lot, it seems. He's offered a touch to everyone. He ran away from me, though, because, when he offered, I mentioned Brokeback Mountain in excitement.
This makes me worry about the relationship between my ESTp husband and INFp sister.
All Hail The Flying Spaghetti Monster
Discuss
- EDITED - dead rabbit removed
Originally Posted by oyburger
there you go
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
lol I wasn't allowed to watch Bambi
I believe my dad thought there was some sort of political agenda to the movie.
Here's a list of other things I was not allowed to watch for various reasons:
Gummi Bears
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles
Tale Spin
The Little Mermaid (I was allowed to see it in the theater, but then I was lectured about how evil it was in the car on the way home)
Mister Rogers Neighborhood
many, many, many, many movies and most shows that had any form of magic in it... I am having trouble recalling specifics at the moment
a friend of mine had a mother like that. he could only play the bible game on nintendo. it was complete b.s. that he had a nintendo but only the bible game. he like coming over to my house because my parents were religious freaks about "magic" and other inane shite and agreed with his parents, but my parents rarely forbid me to prticipate in forms of entertainment because of it. bambi was seen as bad because it had a political agenda against hunters; my father was a hunter. the little mermaid was bad because of subliminal cartoons on the cover of the video; i remember seeing the huge pen_s hidden within the tower of the castle.Originally Posted by Joy
any how, i wanted to hear herzy comment on the relationship of ontotheological speculation to socionics.
LII
that is what i was getting at. if there is an inescapable appropriation that is required in the act of understanding, this brings into question the validity of socionics in describing what is real, and hence stubborn contradictions that continue to plague me.
the little mermaid was bad for a few reasons, the greatest of which was that the father saw it as his fault when his daughter got into troubled when she's the one who DISOBEYED *the crowd gasps* (somehow, the disobedience seemed to be a greater issue with the movie than the fact that the main character made a deal with evil, though that was discussed as well)
after all, everyone knows that children are to OBEY every single thing those in AUTORITY, particularly their parents, order without hesitation or questioning. this is absolute. wives are also to OBEY their husbands.
gah
.
One thing has been on my mind recently...maybe you could give me an answer.
If ESTp, ISTp, ESTj, ISTj and ENTj got into a fist fight what would happen and most of all...who would win? In what order would they go down? I think these are the types most likely to physically beat the crap out of other types. But which of them is the toughest? You can add ESFp and ISFj there too if you want.
who cares? the ENTj would win the law suit.
Star Trek
That is highly illogical.
Star Trek is full of moral situations.
asd
yes, it is.
The only thing my parents forbade me from seeing as a kid was The Crying Game. To this day I still haven't seen it.
All Hail The Flying Spaghetti Monster
Well think about a setting where you have given up the rights to sue anyone. Like a NHB tournament. You could also think of another competitive setting like they are coworkers in the same department and one boss position opens and they all really really want it! Or something I just have a feeling that when these types clash it will be pretty intense in any context.Originally Posted by Joy
I think ISTj. When they go into frenzy mode it's...ugh.Originally Posted by XoX
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
You mean something like this? (idea borrowed from krae )Originally Posted by FDG
Here...a battle between ESTp and ISTj is about to start...(hmm...predators are a bit introvert so perhaps ISTp and ISTj )
Aahahah!! The thing is that ESTps are:
- extraverted
- perceivers
so they let their energy release much more than ISTjs. So when ISTjs actually explode it's BOOOOOOOOOOOM.
As for predator, I think ESTp fits.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Umm...so ESTj vs ESTp would look something like this...Originally Posted by FDG
And here is a confrontational ISTp challenging you to make the first move...
It seems everyone has a very different view of ISTJ then me. I don't see them as agressive at all.Originally Posted by FDG
Now, I don't want to say anything like any type is naturally best at "fist fighting" , but for ISTP, just keep Mike Tyson and Jack Dempsey in mind. Also Ty Cobb and Roger Clemens. And Mike Ditka and Bobby Knight. Those are good representations I think.
They're not as a rule, because they try hard to rationally follow their principles. In the rare occurance of eruption, you'd better run My dad's one. I've seen him only once very angry...I ran, luckilyOriginally Posted by Rocky
Yeah no dobut ISTPs would be at least 2nd [/img]Now, I don't want to say anything like any type is naturally best at "fist fighting" , but for ISTP, just keep Mike Tyson and Jack Dempsey in mind. Also Ty Cobb and Roger Clemens. And Mike Ditka and Bobby Knight. Those are good representations I think.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Whatever, star trek taught me everything i know about treating people right
and beaming.
asd
<3Originally Posted by heath