It's not just me who typed her, my brother was into socionics at one time, as well.
As for Dynamic vs Static and it's relation to autism, I think we have differing understandings of Dynamic and Static. I see Dynamic as processing information that is along the lines of a system, where parts are interacting with other parts and how they influence each other. Trends and changes are noticed rather than sticking with a current moment. Whereas a Static type is mostly looking at things as they are now, and/or what consistently shows up over time/space. Dynamic types, i believe, might have an easier time projecting how something is going to change, and in which direction.
One example (the only famous autistic person I've read about):
Temple Grandin (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_Grandin) is, imo, a dynamic type. She was able to see systems involving animals and their processing, and was able to build more effecient and more humane systems for processing cattle. She knew how everything fit together, what effected what, what changed what, what trends were happening during the processing, how to go about changing some of those trends, etc. She revolutionized how most of the usa processes it's cattle.
When my daughter was first diagnosed, we watched a movie about Temple's life. She was heavily involved in the making of the movie. While my daughter didn't identify with the type of information Temple focused on, she did identify with some of the behavioral reactions. But socionics isn't about behavior...it's about the intra-processing and inter-communicating of information.
Without having fully thought it all out, I might say that Temple is quite possibly TeSi.
If you get a chance to, watch the movie about her.