Quote Originally Posted by Nunki View Post
It's so normal, though, for someone to be exactly what he hates. The only thing that makes me unusual in that area is the fact that I'm so obvious about it. And I hope that Edward Scissorhands isn't one of the movies you're talking about, because the main character is one of the characters I most relate to, and the movie was easily one of the most cathartic things I've ever experienced.

Gamma I'm kind of mixed on, because while I can look very Fe-devaluing--emotionally inexpressive, "hard to read," indifferent--I love being around people who are openly expressive and emotionally energetic, and dislike atmospheres where that sort of thing is discouraged. And I myself can be pretty expressive, too, under the right circumstances; i.e. being in a good mood, etc.

Beta quadra people seem too awesome to be my brothers and sisters. I would want them to accept me, but I think they would consider me out of place.

My answer to this may not be the most indicative one, because I've only been to a pair of museums. But it would be the art museum I went to with a friend of mine, about a year ago (and I will point out that, in theory, I prefer an art museum to a science museum; I'm more fulfilled by the humanities--things with emotional richness or spiritual depth--than I am by information about the workings of the world. What exists in the physical universe is very arbitrary, while what is human is of the deepest significance possible.). I took particular pleasure in the things there that spoke of aristocracy--the golden spoons, the towering wardrobes covered in carved in angels, and all of that. I wish I had been born in a place filled with such things; a golden spoon with rubies set into the handle turns the act of eating into an act of immeasurable grace (I would still wolf everything down, though. That would be good for the aesthetic contrast.).

Hmm. . . I have a feeling you're trying to press my buttons (will I react with outrage or will I calmly agree? Neither: I'm quietly amused), or maybe I just don't realize how LSE I've made myself look in this topic.

. . . Actually, there is not a huge lot that seems outright wrong about me in the LSE profile on Wikisocion. But none of it rings much of a bell, either. I feel like I'm reading a typical horoscope entry; who wouldn't agree with half of these descriptors? Some of it really does seem decidedly wrong, though:



Actually, now that I have this list in front of me, I've changed my mind: there really are a lot of problems here.
These questions are the worse. Type yourself by the functions; the best source and clearest description is in my signature, the blogspot. Let me know what you think.