yes they are completely different.Originally Posted by ScarlettHayden
yes they are completely different.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I've read that sensing in Socionics is different to sensing to MBTI but I'm unsure.. would you be able to give me a breakdown of how the two are different? Because when using the MBTI description I'm probably as far away from sensing as one could possible get.
The best descriptions of functions, that is how socionics is typed is in here:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Yes, Maritsa think you're stupid. Get used to it.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
Lol. Not to toot my own horn but the idea of me being stupid is far removed from reality.
Anyway thanks for the links.. Still doubt I'm an SLE but I'll do some more research and see where I end up.
@Maritsa If you had to choose a type for me besides SLE and LSI what would you say?
SEE. But I have to agree - you don't sound SLE at all.
Last edited by Absurd; 08-17-2013 at 10:38 PM.
SEE?! Seriously? The thought of being an ethical oriented person is depressing.
Why do you say that though?
No. Absurd is pathologically incapable of speaking seriously.
Beta ST (ESTp, ISTj) are my first choices too.
Ah good. Consulting Maritsa is an excellent first step in finding out which types you are not. To further narrow the possibilities I suggest you ask Donald Duck.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
Lmfao. And your opinion to narrow it down even further?
I don't give my opinion on such moronic matters as socionics types.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote