Results 1 to 40 of 1038

Thread: Political Picture Thread

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Moderator xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    8,001
    Mentioned
    224 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grendel View Post
    The "racist" label is a metric institutions use to dictate who they will throw their institutional weight out to materially marginalize.
    If an idea were factually solid and consistent, but it still fit the prescription of "racist," that fact alone could, and in the past has, been used to socially invalidate it. Also, it's not just grassroots censuring of ideas labeled racist either. Platforms of public discourse, which often retain monopoly in their niche because of networking effects, liberally use the "racist" charge to choke certain subjects from public discussion. Applying a label to an idea is NOT criticism, it is an ad-hominem. An ad-hominem that, in this case, is not grassroots, but bears an asymmetrical, institutional stigma.


    Also, when someone starts throwing out innocuous-lookinh conservative ideas, the same types who slander with the "racist" label turn around and accuse these perfectly innocuous ideas of being """"dogwhistles,""" assume they are always coded language with no benefit of the doubt extended, refusing to engage the implications of these proposals on their own terms or merit.
    So whether or not you're "lawful" in handling some right-leaning ideas, it's damned if you do or don't.
    You've totally boxed up the conversation so the only conclusions it can yield are done on YOUR terms.



    And no, you don't get to use the "Well, if you're not a wayciss, why are you so afraid of being called one, HUUUUUUHHHH?!" counterargument. You can say the same thing about calling someone a pedophile or a rapist, but people can still get falsely accused of being them, and the implications of that charge are rightful grounds for anger by the accused.

    I agree with you that this exists on the Left to some extent; I advance that this is rather due to the inherent tribalism of political discourse, meaning that something similar exists on the Right -- by the conflation of Liberalism with ANTIFA for instance. I assure you that I can tell the difference between Conservatism and Reactionary racism.

    Conservatives, especially the Burkean kind, hold a well-articulated, sophisticated ideology that doesn't have the reflexive prejudice and overwrought simplicity of moral outlook inherent to racists and reactionaries.

  2. #2
    Glorious Member mu4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Mind
    Posts
    8,173
    Mentioned
    760 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Avoid propaganda, of which the purpose is to suspend critical thought and spread uncritical thought.

    But if you must suspend critical thought, I recommend having a sound track.



    Particularly one with Faye Wong singing, and female jet pilots.

    Human development starts with people that want progress and progress with those around them, not people that want to swap fluids between themselves in a torrent of their collective contempt and disgust.

    What's your fucking progress?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •