Te and clinical roboticness

[ieist]

huh? at OP

Te is associated with facts. Fi is associated with attraction/repulsion. So to Te/Fi, objects have a bunch of properties (Te) that increases the attraction or the repulsion part. So Te would note the external dynamics of objects and try to determine attraction/repulsion strength between various objects. If Te dislikes (is repulsed by it, has bad Fi relations to it) a person (an object), then the Te person could note what the person likes and use that against them, e.g. destroying an object which the disliked person likes, thus hurting the disliked person's Fi. Makes sense?

[fen]

Te is associated with facts. Fi is associated with attraction/repulsion. So to Te/Fi, objects have a bunch of properties (Te) that increases the attraction or the repulsion part. So Te would note the external dynamics of objects and try to determine attraction/repulsion strength between various objects. If Te dislikes (is repulsed by it, has bad Fi relations to it) a person (an object), then the Te person could note what the person likes and use that against them, e.g. destroying an object which the disliked person likes, thus hurting the disliked person's Fi. Makes sense?

I think any type is capable of being hurtful as you are describing.
Something to keep in mind, socionics isn't for explaining behaviors really. It's more for how information is processed....which CAN sort of lead to certain trends sometimes..but these trends don't apply to everyone. I certainly don't believe every LSE is a sadist as you are describing.