Considering that he has been studying socionics for a year, this is probably not that helpful.Originally Posted by Maritsa
Corwin, can you give any relationship analysis? Do you think you know other people's types, and can you measure your own based off of your interaction with them?
Actually the description of these functions on this page are bit better for me to understand since they have more concrete examples I can relate to.
I was able to relate to the irrational elements much more than the rational ones. And I really clicked with(Always have really). The rational elements are harder to tell. Though, from the linked descriptions ILE fits far better than IEE. And I think ILE fits with all the stuff I said before.
My Ex typed her self once and she decided on LSE. I have a hard time defining our intertype relationship without reference to types. But if I go with ILE and LSE, that makes her my Benefactor. It fits well, our relationship always felt asymmetrical, I did kind of want her to change, but I could tell that I wasn't holding my end so I never pushed it. Eventually she stood firm on her desire for me to change in ways that I found too difficult (Have a stable job, be more outgoing and meet new people, stop being so mistrusting and judging of her friends). I tried many times, but I was never able to maintain it.
didn't you notice the title of this thread? or can you not read
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I can't read.
Se PoLR
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
There's only the Maritsa way, or the wrong way.:
The right way, is an entirely foreign phenomenon for the discussion that is about to ensue.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
