The basis for the theory is this
http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.p...ological_Types and this
http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.p...ion_Metabolism
Now you could critique the actual theories being developed here, but you don't have much of an argument.No offense, but this is a worthless statement - it doesn't really say anything. a) What is claimed in a random way?
b) How can a classification system fuck up to the extent of classifying something wrongly? Certainly the user of a classification system could "fuck up" - but somebody can't be classified by the system opposite to how they
should be. . . because that would just mean that they should have been classified differently in the first place- which would mean the system still retains consistency.
By saying that the weaknesses are a "matter of imbalance" you connotate a different meaning than what was intended. Psychological weaknesses aren't "imbalances" in the same way that some people have a sodium imbalance, or a vitamin C deficiency. They are inborn traits much like being brown eyed or blue eyed - and they aren't an "imbalance" because there is no such thing as
the "balance."
The system also limits self improvement in a way - channeling energy through the super-ego is supposed to be seen as something that can never really produce the true or healthy results that we wanted. The super-id is also not seen as something that we can supply for ourselves.
My thoughts have enough food as is. I need to put them on a diet if anything.