Based on my understanding, a highly preferred Si would entail a greater level of entrenchment in physical reality, with less time spent daydreaming and in one's head. I find that the opposite is true. It would also imply a higher ability to remember and sift through detailed data. Si users in Jung and MBTI also tend to be unquestioning and to an extent, bureaucratic, when I am anything but.
Plus all of that stuff that you didn't bold.
I think you have the wrong understanding of SiOriginally Posted by Narcotic
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Ni isnt daydreaming, and this isnt MBTI. If this line of logic were true, Ni types would be winning the lottery daily.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
