I MADE A WEBSITE THAT ANALYZES YOUR ESSAY AND TELLS YOU YOUR TYPE

[ClownsandEntropy]

I think there is a possibility to make a program like this produce accurate results when given a text of enough length. But rather than trying to figure out an algorithm, I would simply use a large group of verified people (this is, people you're sure what type they are) and use a neural network to find the patterns.

Or maybe using Reinin Dichotomies like Asking/Declaring and Static/Dynamic and also http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/...ill-theres-way

[Jonathan]

INPUT: Does this thing work...

That's a good approach to try to deconstruct it. But really, it's hard to get to the bottom to of it by experimentation because it's amalgamating different things. To see what's really going on, experiment with the source (http://www.uclassify.com/browse/prfekt). The source gives you percentages, so you can really see if you hit one of its triggers.

Single words seem to be very effective in TF mode:
love: 100% feeling
algorithm: 94.6% thinking

Also in SN mode:
love: 97.1 % sensing.
math: 100% intuition.
"love of math": 100% intuition.
"love of stars": 100% sensing.
Change word order...same result.
As to I/E:
"Hey you guys!!!!" 100% extraversion
"Time is space" 100% introversion

The J/P one is the hardest to figure out. Personally, I'm skeptical of anyone doing a text analysis of MBTI J/P in isolation without doing I/E along with it. But the key question for Slava's test (which assumes the mostly discredited "J/P switch" theory and of course is applying an MBTI-type test instead of a Socionics-based approach) is whether in any sense Prefekt's conception of J/P has anything to do with Jung's rational/irrational dichotomy, or if it's more J/P in an MBTI sense.
It's hard to know what will trigger J/P
If you put up a single word and then you put a period after it, the period makes a huge difference in J/P mode.

"procrastinate" 50/50
"procrastinate." 100% perceiving (the period made all the difference)

"Just meandering through my thoughts and then" 70.8% judging
"Let's get this done!" 100% judging
"That doesn't work because of A, B, and C." 58.7 % judging
"That doesn't work because of the definition only applies to elements of A, but this isn't an element of A." 90.4 % judging
"bird Hancock ox computer of that in" 99.4 % perceiving
"It was cold outside." 88% judging
". outside cold was it" 52% judging
"The porcupine helped the cheesecake deliver mail." 100% judging
"cheesecake The deliver porcupine helped mail. the" 100% judging
"cheesecake porcupine" 100% judging
"The ox helped the computer deliver the bird." 99.5 % perceiving
"ox" 100% perceiving
Okay, so now we know...Something with an ox in it will be perceiving according to this MBTI tool, which according to the original poster would make it judging if introverted.

[LeaT]

I tried some different texts. When it comes to my fiction, it unbashedly claims me to be ESFP/ESFp regardless of the fiction I wrote, and when I copied some text from my MA thesis it said INTJ/INTp. if I insert some random text extract written on a forum it spits out ISFJ/ISFp at me lol.