ESI. Probably E4.
ESI. Probably E4.
Aha!Originally Posted by Ashton
I don't know if she is ISFj or your dual but watching that interview bit i did think a girl like that would be a good match for you Ash.
Now this is a story all about how, my type got changed, turned upside down. Just wait for a minute and watch chatbox right there, & I'll tell how Gem became the moderator with blue hair.
In typology central friended and praised, on the picture thread was where she spent most her days. Chilling out, selfies, relaxing all cool, And all typing some people and getting them schooled.
When a couple of girls who were up to no good, Started annoying her & her friends in the forumhood, She got in one little flame war & got pissed off & said 'I'm moving in with that exboyfriend in the forum with the socionics toffs.
So Gem pulls up to the forum for a year without being a hater, And yells to typocentral 'Yo creeps! Smell Ya later', Became a mod in her kingdom she was finally there, To sit on her throne as the mod with blue hair.
InvisibruJim
TOTALLY!!! @Ashton
I just started looking into temperaments. Her movements seem too jerky and awkward for ip. I would have to watch a interview.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Why ISFj? She seems very intuitive to me...She seems to have a hard time explaining herself or what she's attempting to do, using vague language at best, describes trends constantly in interviews, etc. she also clearly has a bent towards ethics and appears more perceiving than judging....just my opinion. Though I very much agree she is e4
Difficulty explaining one's self is pretty standard for IXFx types in general IME.
She has a lot more of a physical awareness/presence than I get from IEIs—watch where her eyes pan, and you can see she's more attentive to what's directly in front of her; she doesn't look upwards a great deal, nor as if peering towards some faraway horizon like people tend to do when they're mentally visualizing something (you'll see Ni types do this a lot). She also narrates a great deal primarily from direct experience—i.e., "i saw this, felt that, these events happened and it was like…"—rather than articulating her experiences in a more detachedly abstract sense (which is more common among Ni egos).
Couple other relevant videos:
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote