Mm sharp look in the eyes, when the eyebrows are straight and rest directly above the eyes. As for body I don’t really care but a slim slightly fit figure is the best.
https://imgur.com/a/QDbJHUu
Mm sharp look in the eyes, when the eyebrows are straight and rest directly above the eyes. As for body I don’t really care but a slim slightly fit figure is the best.
https://imgur.com/a/QDbJHUu
I like large piercing blue or green eyes, soft white skin, blonde hair, and petite physique.
If I had to name a famous individual that best exemplifies my type, it would be Natalia Poklonskaya, now moreso than 2014 when she was really famous. She ages like fine wine and gets better looking by the year.
thick framed (I don't use the terms "Thick", "Fat", or even "Muscular" b/c it has more to do with bone structure imo). If I can't imagine wrestling them to the ground without hurting them then I can't be with them.
I like darker hair and have a preference towards dolichocephaly
Beautiful big brown eyes. Dark hair. Expressive and nice smile. A nice jaw. More of a naturally/thicker muscular body, especially chest and back. Fuller-ish lips. A warm face.
The personality I guess
2D men.
If they ever tryna neck, I'll put my foot up in your caca
Call your mama and your papa
Like I'm finna take your dadda
Turn that bitch into a soccer ball and rocka, rocka, rocka (brrr)
Get into it like a suit
And fuck a stack up like a broker
In My male angel I'm mainly just interested in compliments and feelings of stardom or juicy injections of flair and wide eyed candy offerings of swirling pride and the bazooka of crosshair focus and Soulful interrogation of all of My Lightning Crystals!!*
ORRE COLOSSEUM JUST GOT STARTED, AND KOBE IS REIGNING AS KING!!
It's Henry vs Zidane, France vs Spain in the 2024 Olympic soccer final, Egypt vs Japan, Yugioh vs Pokemon, Poimandres vs Zarathustra, Giordano Bruno vs Friedrich Nietzsche, haystack picnic robed in silver rods to treasures of lore and sacred spark to unite and forge dancing stars and futures refracting crystal moonlight lures of hanger bay crunching fabrics webbing steel and blizzards juice stringing code red trains of yonder fluid ribbons trophy waterfall cake blueprints frenzy retracting haunted capital terra horns of leading edge canopy blossoms rendezvous shuffling Articuno!!
RaptorWizard Sci-Fi Empire Lugia Bunny ~ Ultimate Aeon Willpower: Wes Net (the16types.info)
The physical features of the guy who is like Robert De Niro here. I don't know what these feature are, but the features sound promising.
Man grows used to everything, the scoundrel!
-Raskolnikov
don't care. ppl are unattractive or not just by being bipedal brains. half the time i don't even look at people directly anyways. they are just a burning source of energy and occasionally love.
A guy who says and does this... Don't care what he looks like.
Man grows used to everything, the scoundrel!
-Raskolnikov
I like all kinds of things, I find people can be beautiful in many different ways. The features that make me weak in the knees are:
Super long dark hair.
Big almond-shaped dark eyes.
Pillowy lips.
Olive to caramel skin tone.
Clear and healthy skin.
Athletic and toned body.
Bonus points for (and this is a weird one) a raspy voice is extremely sexy and I don't know why.
Personality and attitude are very big for me though and could trump all of these things.
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
I always liked well-manicured nails, long, and painted a dark color, preferably black. This turns me on for some reason. A girl at my old job would tap her nails on her desk and it was uncomfortably erotic.
I also like to be stabbed and scrapped by long nails.
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
Kind eyes that are listening and present.
@Eudaimonia, maybe she was trying to be "provoking". Have you heard of AMSR for inducing sleep? Finger tapping is a thing with that, because it is subtly and gently pleasurable and makes you sleepy. Whispering is a thing too, and odd things like random sounds, writing, turning pages, or opening boxes with crinkly paper and wrappings, or arranging items, and odd role-playing (like, being a librarian or make-up artist, or some "expert" explaining things to you - all kinds of strange things). Its good for quieting my mind at bedtime, as I am apt, even if very tired, let myself get racing thoughts about some new interesting idea, and get a second wind instead of winding down.
In fact, since it's late and I don't want to be tempted to stay up, while I write this, I am listening to this below, and it is really doing the trick. I had a handful of things I was going to do on the computer before bed, and before I even finish this one post I decided to just write myself for a reminder of those things for the morning, because now those little accomplishments don't seem so pressing! (I just want to sleep):
"A man with a definite belief always appears bizarre, because he does not change with the world; he has climbed into a fixed star, and the earth whizzes below him like a zoetrope."
........ G. ........... K. ............... C ........ H ........ E ...... S ........ T ...... E ........ R ........ T ........ O ........ N ........
"Having a clear faith, based on the creed of the Church, is often labeled today as fundamentalism... Whereas relativism, which is letting oneself be tossed and swept along
by every wind of teaching, looks like the only
attitude acceptable to today's standards." - Pope Benedict the XVI, "The Dictatorship of Relativism"
.
.
.
I've heard that from my end from many a sadly broken woman. The eyes of an ILI tend to be bluish-grey as a gun barrel and resemble wells that seem to drink them in.
I used to think of myself as being lucky somehow in this regard. Now? Now I think I'm not. I can likely fix most people, but if they're screwed up badly enough I plain and simply don't have the time. There is literally something wrong with them and I will need a miracle if I hope to fix it fast enough such that I can answer my call to matrimony and all that entails!
"A man with a definite belief always appears bizarre, because he does not change with the world; he has climbed into a fixed star, and the earth whizzes below him like a zoetrope."
........ G. ........... K. ............... C ........ H ........ E ...... S ........ T ...... E ........ R ........ T ........ O ........ N ........
"Having a clear faith, based on the creed of the Church, is often labeled today as fundamentalism... Whereas relativism, which is letting oneself be tossed and swept along
by every wind of teaching, looks like the only
attitude acceptable to today's standards." - Pope Benedict the XVI, "The Dictatorship of Relativism"
.
.
.
This is going to sound really creepy but really healthy-looking hair, skin, and nails are really attractive.
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
Ooh I prefer a really fat person who doesn't take care of himself and will be dead in 5 years and if I don't I should be upset at myself even though I'll die in 3 lol
Minds connect, not bodies.
I mean yeah obviously it feels better to lick your tongue across a fit bicep than omega male flab- but if the fit muscle jock is also some narcissistic jerk (like they often are) it kinda cheapens the whole thing for me. If the stud is also weird and unique in the right ways it's a blast to me but usually being a Chad is a 'Karen' thing that turns me off.
Whether due to narcissism or who knows what, I tend to roll with assortative mating. Not just in regards to social status but looks as well. That and I noticed that who I am currently friends with also shapes my interests. Do I have a friend who has blue eyes? Guess I'm into that now. Factoring that, my likes are somewhat fluid. Overall though, what provokes my lust is bustiness. Boobs are great, and they're especially great when they are huge. And no, a mere "D cup" isn't huge. I have a rule of thumb. If she can't suffocate me or give me brain damage with them, I'm likely not interested. A woman with meat is how I vibe. That said a complimentary plump ass and pudgy belly is great. BBW is sometimes decent because of this. However, this is basically my lust speaking. As for what I find "beautiful", typically, these archetypes of women: 1. dark hair with pale skin and blue eyes, 2. blonde hair with green eyes, and 3. dark brunette with tan-dark skin. Also for some reason, I find I do tend to like negative canthal tilts. Not always, sometimes they throw me off. But when they're good... they're good. They can appear friendly, maybe even wise. I do want a woman who can provide guidance as well as affection, and such eyes can be the gateway to such a soul that could do so. That said, I tend to not like "hunter eyes". They usually make me feel uneasy. Like, I feel molested just by making eye contact. And err ehh- I tend to like a similar height to mine. Not greatly shorter or taller than me.
However... despite everything I said... my crush at work is the opposite of almost everything I said. She's average short height. Has hunter-ish eyes. And flat on both in the front and back. Even her hair type is not how I vibe either... What the fuck is my life? I'm so deranged and weird.
Any face shape that isn't square is preferable to me. Faces like this aren't my cup of tea even if their other features are fine.
https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qim...e9411d6e3445d7
https://deadline.com/wp-content/uplo...size=681%2C383
When it comes to the rest of the face I'm quite indiscriminate outside of the normal standards of beauty, e.g. distance between the eyes, forehead size etc. The color of eyes/hair/skin doesn't matter to me.
In terms of body, I'm definitely attracted to medium/large boobs, a feminine hourglass/pear hips, and a big perky ass. I've never been into other areas like the neck, legs and feet. I also don't like girls with abs or defined upper bodies either.
Last edited by Resonare; 11-17-2021 at 01:09 PM.
I've said it before, but strong fat wide torso, a lot of stubborn belly fat (but all around fat torso not just the belly), long, lean, strong, muscular but slim legs, flat buttocks that pants and underwear accentuate the crack, get caught up in all the time and beautifully outline, anus right in between the legs... necessary.
round face, some cases horse face is nice, short facial height is nice, no square faces.
absolutely necessary to have never had facial hair.
huge, aquiline nose is nice.
laughs a lot (like natalie portman) doesn't have to be sincere, but has a pretty laugh like natalie portman does; not a forced stiff retarded looking laughter like some LIE and ESI do.
large natural firm round breasts are nice.
naturally red-blonde hair, blue-green eyes, naturally light eye brows are nice.
i love Se ego-style (and ILE-Ti eyes, morgan webb's are sexy when they're animated) intense eyes.
freckled, celtic skin, naturally thin/dry-looking is nice; sweat is also nice.
gentleness, beautiful, smooth gliding movements, lightly grips things... i love those features.
very high level of endurance, naturally moves fast is necessary.
it's also necessary for her to have high level of physical self-control, and never react to stimuli reflexively
I'm sorry, but I'm psychologically disturbed.
I’ve always been teased for my interesting physical taste.
I love men with wide hips. Not when caused by fat but when the bone structure is wide-set.
I find large foreheads attractive. If a man has a shorter forehead, he somehow looks less trustworthy to me.
All the people I’ve been attracted to have been brunettes.
I like dark hair and well-defined bone structure; high cheekbones and a sharp jawline. I also envy long eyelashes. Uncommon eye colors are nice to look at too.
- taller than me
- deepset brown eyes that turn down at the ends
- broad eyebrows
- not too pale
- pretty hands that are bigger than mine
- a distinct nose
- full lips
- full, dark, curly hair
hmmm thats all ive got off the top of my head
I actually find people with Gulenko's SEE characteristics to be pretty hot.
As far as conventional standards go, I find Bryce Dallas Howard to be pretty hot. I think she's as SEE, too.
Last edited by ILoveChinchillas; 04-02-2022 at 07:35 PM.
great sport
Her beauty has to impress me everytime I see her. Current favorite above.
A shy smile.
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
I was thinking about this thread the other day. There is a quality I find mesmerizing and that is an inherent primal physicality. A specimen that is more animal than human. Certain activities can bring out this quality, usually sport or dancing. Seeing someone move their body in such a way is hypnotic to me. It reminds me of a time Albert Camus described a woman dancing:
“At Padovani Beach the dance hall is open every day. And in that huge rectangular box with its entire side open to the sea, the poor young people of the neighborhood dance until evening. Often I used to await there a a moment of exceptional beauty. During the day the hall is protected by sloping wooden awnings. When the sun goes down they are raised. Then the hall is filled with an odd green light born of the double shell of the sky and the sea. When one is seated far from the windows, one sees only the sky and, silhouetted against it, the faces of the dancers passing in succession. Sometimes a waltz is being played, and against the green background the black profiles whirl obstinately like those cut-out silhouettes that are attached to a phonograph's turntable. Night comes rapidly after this, and with it the lights. But I am unable to relate the thrill and secrecy that subtle instant holds for me. I recall at least a magnificent tall girl who had danced all afternoon. She was wearing a jasmine garland on her right blue dress, wet with perspiration from the small of her back to her legs. She was laughing as she danced and throwing back her head. As she passed the tables, she left behind her a mingled scent of flowers and flesh. When evening came, I could no longer see her body pressed tight to her partner, but against her body alternating spots of white jasmine and black hair, and when she would throw back her swelling breast I would hear her laugh and see her partner's profile suddenly plunge forward. I owe to such evenings the idea I have of innocence. In any case, I learn not to separate these creatures bursting with violent energy from the sky where their desires whirl.”
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
Tall, Slim, Bright Smile, Expressive Eyes
Pretty face, big butt, small waist
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
Men:
-Short hair.
-A face that basically doesn't look weak, feminine, dumb, or weird in some way. I'm not really sure how to explain what "attractive" looks like to me because some faces that are attractive are more similar to baby faces and others are clearly masculine men.
-Piercing eyes (probably). See above.
-Thin to average body type with below average to low body fat. I tend to like some muscles. Muscular can be okay, but it depends on the size of the muscles (muscles that are too big tend to bother me for some reason).
-Average or low body hair.
Women:
-A to maybe D cup perky tits. I'd generally prefer these not to be fake.
-Thin to maybe average or below average body type. Generally, I'm not really into curvy or overweight bodies.
-I guess a round ass doesn't hurt.
-Nice looking face, especially if it looks kind of stoic.
-Moderately sized lips.
Generally, my preference in people seems to change if I like them. My preferences in looks have also changed after I looked at pictures of less attractive people. Usually, personal and situational qualities are more important to me than physical attractiveness. By situational qualities, I mean that if I see someone do something pretty hot, like rip apart something dangerous with his bare hands, I will probably be a little into him even if he has long hair.
I would consider myself to be a little bicurious. I have no plans of dating women.
Edit: I guess I would like my men and/or women to be the same height or taller than me as well.
Edit 2 (1/21/23, 17:21 pm): I'll try to rewrite the above information in a way that doesn't sound as blunt or crass.
Men:
-Intelligent looking.
-I guess objectively attractive traits. These are probably hard to explain.
-Short hair.
-Strong or tough looking.
-Low emotional qualities.
-Thin or average body type. For some reason, I don't like stocky people.
-Probably low body hair.
Women:
-Intelligent looking.
-Not clearly or overly feminine.
-Probably no fake tits.
-Thin to average body type. I don't think I like heavy set women.
-Stoic.
As far as I know, looks aren't that important to me. I've had multiple boyfriends who all looked dissatisfying to me at first, but I seemed to get used to them. However, I wouldn't call these relationships long lasting. I'm pretty sure I'm not lesbian because I'm more attracted to males and male traits (especially personality) than females and female traits.
Last edited by Clarke; 01-21-2023 at 04:22 AM.
I like all kinds of men. I definitely find beautiful eyes very attractive. I also love it when a guy has a nice Adam’s apple or a cleft chin; can’t explain why. Deep voices are wonderful to me, too. And body hair