Originally Posted by
Absurd
Even as I sit here, I can't believe I'm writing this. I've never been one to voice my opinions in such a public manner. But after learning that Jadae wants to call evil good and good evil, I felt I at least had to set a few things straight. Before I say anything else, let me remind him that it is more than a purely historical question to ask, "How did his reign of terror start?" or even the more urgent question, "How might it end?". No, we must ask, "Is he so polyloquent as to think that this can go on forever?" Whatever the answer, I want to live my life as I see fit. I can't do that while Jadae still has the ability to insist that our society be infested with solipsism, racialism, exclusivism, and an impressive swarm of other "isms".
As for the lies and exaggerations, one of the great mysteries of modern life is, Where is Jadae's integrity? I allege that that’s not my question to answer. I will say, however, that Jadae claims that society will benefit if he goes ahead with his plan to put mindless sad sacks on the federal payroll. That's like pulling up a plant to see how the roots are doing. It also proves that Jadae is oblivious to the fact that to get even the simplest message into the consciousness of hideous, anti-democratic grafters it has to be repeated at least fifty times. Now, I don't want to insult your intelligence by telling you the following fifty times, but he claims to have turned over a new leaf shortly after getting caught trying to irrationalize thinking on every issue. This claim is an outright lie that is still being circulated by Jadae's representatives. The truth is that if Jadae had his way, schools would teach students that there is something intellectually provocative in the tired rehashing of self-satisfied stereotypes. This is not education but indoctrination. It prevents students from learning about how it is not news that Jadae is eating our lunch. What speaks volumes, though, is that it's grotesque for him to lead a repulsive jihad against those who oppose him. Or perhaps I should say, it's mutinous.
Whenever people fail to fall for Jadae's nocuous deceptions, he tries leading them to the slaughterhouse via the back entrance. If that ploy still doesn't work, Jadae then sics his blood-drenched, murderous Praetorian Guard in all of its resplendent foulness upon them. You may balk at this, but throughout history, there has been a clash between those who wish to evaluate the tactics he has used against me and those who wish to cripple Jadae's castigators politically, economically, socially, morally, and psychologically. Naturally, Jadae belongs to the latter category. He manipulates public opinion through raw emotion, sexual desire, "family values", comedy, music, entertainment, false religion, social engineering, journalistic propaganda, and junk science. But let's not quibble about that. A central fault line runs through each of his "compromises". Specifically, he has a vested interest in maintaining the myths that keep his retinue loyal to him. Jadae's principal myth is that his wanton faction is a respected civil-rights organization. The truth is that Jadae would have you believe that profits come before people. I have already, for the present at least, sufficiently answered the climatic part of this proposition and have only to add that Jadae wants to make us less united, less moral, less sensitive, less engaged, and more perversely harebrained. This desire is implanted in a part of his brain that's immune to reason or argument. Consequently, there's no chance that we can get him to see that his maudlin preoccupation with yahooism, usually sicklied over with such nonsense words as "counterintelligence", would make sense if a person's honor were determined strictly by his or her ability to inculcate the hermeneutics of suspicion in otherwise open-minded people. As that's not the case, we can conclude only that the baneful nature of his missives is not just a rumor. It is a fact to which I can testify. As I have tried to show in this letter, Jadae's flunkies are too indolent to institute change. As long as you remember that, we may yet be able to condemn—without hesitation, without remorse—all those who elevate Jadae's memoranda to prominence as epistemological principles.