What do you think her type is?
What do you think her type is?
Last edited by Clumsy; 06-02-2012 at 03:55 AM.
Fi-ENFp. Reminds me of several IEEs I've known in real life.
love her pink shirt in the second interview.
Well aside from sheer vibe, in that first video she speaks in such a scattered way like her mind is jumping from place to place and struggling to stay on track. I definitely see this in myself, and it seems indicative of a Result-type mindset. The way she moves around strikes me as extrovert + static, in that she sort of jumps from a moment of higher energy to lower and back again in these discrete bursts. This leaves ENFp + ESTp, and I don't see her as speaking in terms of discrete qualia about the world around her, opting for more generalizations instead of specific instances of sensory awareness, and she seems to have great difficulty in expressing real-world actualizations of what she's describing. Look at when she's describing Robert Downey Jr., whole wheelbarrow full of abstracted impressions about the guy but almost nothing describing specific instances of his character.
Bump
i love her
ESI all the way.
i don't know actually, but she's a lot softer than rooney mara, who i think might be gamma, even her portrayal of lisbeth salander (gamma) was "lighter" in comparison. rooney mara was who i had in mind when i re-read the books because she seemed to understand lisbeth salander on a more intrinsic level. i haven't found as many interviews of noomi rapace commenting on her experiences playing lisbeth salander, but you can even see this contrast in how they relay their individual experiences, it seems like there's an integral part of lisbeth salander's experiences which are lost on noomi rapace, for one reason or another, whereas i recall rooney mara expressing constant indignation over how misunderstood she felt the character was, which i agreed with.
anyway i don't know where people are getting esi from, plus sometimes i just like to find excuses to talk about the millenium series
There's somebody around here that I think is the same type as this woman.
ESE
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
@hag 2
Ola Rapace - EIE
> Duality doesn't always happen in marriages, but odds are good in 10yr marriages it's one of the most-common ones
It mb "one of the most-common ones", but anyway to have low % of pairs (alike 10%), including stable ones. As many important factors take part.
@hag 2 yeah could be
Not IEI. If you're looking for some examples she is similar to, see pics of Paul Simon, Gal Gadot, Andy Warhol, and very distantly Sasha Grey - all four Si-leads.
I'd type her as SEI 6w5 sx/sp, the strong sx 'seducer' subtype. Her ex-husband VI's like an LSI so/sx, so it was a "benefit" marriage between them where she was 2x his benefactor.
Yeah I think SEI (not IEI) is reasonable for her too. Too grounded.
Bump!
SEE-Fi?
IEE is my guess.
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".