um
why does your siggy say sle-ti 8w9
um
why does your siggy say sle-ti 8w9
<Crispy> what subt doesnt understand is that a healthy reaction to "FUCK YOU" isand not
Is there a reason that it shouldn't?Originally Posted by thePirate
Does my type-me thread lead you to believe otherwise? Why is that?
I am going to assume this is some kind of elaborate ruse. kudos!Is there a reason that it shouldn't?
<Crispy> what subt doesnt understand is that a healthy reaction to "FUCK YOU" is
I was testing to see if people would respond to it and come in and tell me how obviously not SLE I am, but it seems to have backfired in the sense that no one actually believes that I believe I could possibly be anything other than ILE. ): #AlphaWorldProblems
I think this is an obviously trend you've noticed about people on the forum; a new member will say "I think I'm ILI; what do you think" and majority will respond with "yes, you are" instead of looking at things objectively.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
That seems to be the case if said member is ILI. The trend I've actually noticed is that most people tend to go out of their way to point out if they think someone is mistyped and then listen to them and have a discussion over whether or not this is an accurate typing for them with information flowing both ways. Though you do occasionally get those members who refuse to hear anything that does fit what they think is Right, and who passive-aggressively twist things to be the way they want instead of looking at things objectively. Funnily enough, the latter type of person has their head so far up their ass, that they actually think they're the ones that are being objective.
Crazy, huh?!
^would you say that you look at things in the mirror way that I do?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
