That's what I said; I'm supervised by you.Originally Posted by Maritsa33
That's what I said; I'm supervised by you.
I asked you a question; I didn't trump you around. I asked if what you wrote above seemed in any way to be kind of the opposite view point of what I hold; that's not Fi.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Reread our two points here and tell me in what way do they reflect on each other:
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...l=1#post876626
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
If disagreeing with anything you say is "mirroring" you, then the entire forum is IEE. @Slacker has no need to worry after all!
How about looking at what I actually have said in this thread? How has anything I've posted creative Fi in the slightest? You're grasping at straws and trying to look at how I set up a sentence instead of taking into account something I might have done as a rhetorical affect for those watching (but that almost sounds like valued Fe! What is this madness?!)
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
Have you met AmbivalentExistence?
Yes, we've talked on multiple occasions. She's an IEE, too, no doubt. I'm sure she disagrees with Maritsa on something. How about you? Yeah, you're probably IEE, too. Either that or SEE.
CONFIRM.
ps- I like your sig.
Nah, I'm SLI on Maritsa's list, I don't supervise her.
In our post:
We're both analyzing the activity of being unobjective or non objective but are doing it different ways; I am attributing to the lack of objectivity to the people who are typing and you are attributing lack of objectivity to the people who are being typed....
Do you see the mirror effect now?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
blahblahblah I'm ignoring what you're saying because my name is Maritsa blahblah.
I was being passive-aggressive to you as you were to me, but now I'm beginning to think you're just dense. I was referring to you. Just you. Only you. The "people" in that quote that you're attributing to us being reflecting? The ones with the head so far up their ass that they're seeing daylight? I was talking about you. Just you. No one else. How are you so thick that you can't even pick up on someone insulting you and instead try and attribute that to type?
Honestly, your opinions are a joke and everything you say is so completely worthless. Maybe one day you'll start actually paying attention to the content of the post and what I'm saying. Nothing I have said in this thread suggests Fi-creative or Te-demonstrative or, most especially, Ti-polr. Funnily enough, it's clearly Ti-creative, Fe-demonstrative, and Fi-polr. Hmm. Yeah, you're right. I'm probably IEE, despite this overwhelming evidence to the contrary. I should have titled this thread, "In Which You're All Invited to Discuss My Typing (except Maritsa)".
Ok, be ILE, if that's what you want.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I want to be a tree and live in the rainforest.
ILE; INTP
5w6 so; rcUe|I|;
I'm not trying to type you or anyone as I don't believe in that stuff. But I wanted to say something:
The one thing where we are different is that I do like to go into too much detail when explaining things. Some people have an attention span too short for that.
I'm kind of like, I look at the details hard and long, then after a while I'll of course get to the broad generalization but it's not really my end goal as a broad generalization can't really be used for my projects and thus pretty boring if I get into that sort of stuff for too long. So it is more like a side thing to my thinking process, which otherwise mostly consists of me analysing all those details to death and then build a logical structure out of it... actually that is the end result for me along with a kind of competency in the topic I was analysing.
haha.
Fox, you look like awesome fun!And I think it's certain you're Fe-valuing.
IEI-Fe 4w3
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
