Quote Originally Posted by Ver View Post
I've been thinking about temparaments in general for the last few days and I've come up to the conclusion that maybe the definitions are too rigid... IMO we usually have SOME traits of certain temperaments but not all of them. I think the theory of socionics will change in the future, like almost everything does. The more people research it, the more changes/modifications will apear. I'm also inclined to think subtypes affect your rationality/irrationality.
This may be me being too rigid, boring and predictable, but it's nice to have a system which doesn't have too many nuances and inconsistencies? I mean, I guess if temperament is more complicated than the current system, it might do service to change it, but I'm not sure the temperaments are necessarily too rigid as they are. And I also like them all neat and tidy.