Maritsa, why you no love me anymore?
Maritsa, why you no love me anymore?
see. I'm loving you the fast way, through your stomach.Originally Posted by GayLordJedi
Maritsa, why you no love me anymore?
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I dont understand?
I don't see how you can come down on anyone, Andellise. You're a goddamn clown. I really think some people here could learn to say they are wrong every now and then.
"BUT, SOCIONICS.US IS WRITTEN IN STONE! IT'S GOD-LIKE!" LMFAO.
In the butt might be faster thosee. I'm loving you the fast way, through your stomach.
Uhhh, if you read, I have said I was wrong several times (in so many words). I show enough humility..... DUH. Research before you reply, loser. I generally cover hypocrisy.
The problem here happens to be that I am more complicated than your little brains can follow. If you follow my posts and can figure it out, you will know better than to post something this goddamn idiotic. I'm pretty tired of the idiocy on this site.
How about this, you fucking piece of shit. Go away and mind your own goddamn business, and stop stalking me before I try to do something about it. How's that?
If you don't like my posts, don't read them. It doesn't take a monkey brain to figure that one out, oh but alas.... maybe it does.
I'm fucking tired of you.
This site is like grinding your wheels to get all-of-nowhere. Intelligence unfortunately does not mean one can think. Trolling unfortunately is fucking useless, and yes, I've done it too, but when it gets to be a daily matter, well, that usually means something more than just the occasional trolling for fun, like bitterness has taken hold or someone really has no life so they are getting their "kicks" often off of trying to brutalize other people, or it could just mean stupidity and lack of focus/motivation. The one thing that people like you can offer me is the ability to be thankful that I'm not you, and to feel happy about my life and who I am, and what I'm doing with myself. Wow. You def have some antisocial tendencies going on...... Unfortunately, young people mistake antisocial for self-esteem.
Last edited by jet city woman; 04-16-2012 at 04:33 PM.
lol ^^^
Anyways, Maritsa, if you wanna try to stop typing me, we could just be friends. Does that sound acceptable?
^wants the upper hand in defining the relationship, and wants to define the relationship and wants a relationship he can be content with; if it's going to proceed forward it's going to be on your terms. CONTROLING. DID YOU READ MY POST ON THE LSE CONTROLLING?
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...uality-LSE-EII
You can always be friends with me.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Why did I click on this thread thinking this was some spin off of those "Ask Abby" columns?
le sigh
Its probably not a wise idea to click on any thread I create.
Oh come on.
I just watched Weird Science for the 5th time. It's so goooood
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
lol
Okay, Im going to try to pointlessly tackle this.
I am not trying to empower/have control for only myself. I am not trying to do this for you, either. The attempt is based on the idea of what is healthy in all relations, which is to say you are there and I am here, and that is fine. In other words, I do not want anyone to have specific control, since that is the appropriate thing to do. Neither party defers to the other.
Why? Wiki:
"LSEs are sensitive to the productivity, quality, and effectiveness of everything around them. These are topics that they discuss frequently and have strong opinions about. They tend to freely comment on that which is pointless, poorly done, bound to fail, and all manifestations of unprofessionalism, as well as offer numerous tips and pointers for how these things can be improved."
And, what are you doing here?
Why isn't it a good idea? How can you measure what is and isn't? It may be because you know, because you've figured out the right logical formula for what is or isn't.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Look Jedi! Don't argue with me. You're LSE and that's that.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Game over, man. I give up on you.
I give up too.
Every time I mention LSE, you get a negative vibe and run away. What is so bad about being an LSE?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
You see your responding back to me as pointless; hence you're using logic because you're estimating what is worth it or not; hence you use logic to make that determination; what is so not correct about my analysis?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
You dont even try to understand me as a person, and you are frequently wrong about my own personal being. My reaction has little to do with socionics. If you read between the lines, I was saying that I would be fine with knowing you as a person and not through the guise of type. The latter, I feel, is via a lens of superficial being. However, since you cannot perceive any of what I mean and intend, there really is no point in carrying on -- it only serves to further agitate both parties into oblivion.
I think you're too worried that I may like you as a type rather than getting to know you as a person, but you would agree that getting to know someone as a person takes time, information, etc. Be patient.
Don't go into preemptive panic mode.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I'm not. Youre actually just pissing me off, which only makes me wonder if youre the best at trolling me ever, lol.
Maritsa, why can't you accept another's right to autonomy?
m0re: Is it possible that you are guilty of projective indentification? If not, why?
I've decided that, regardless the fun of "being typed" if your going to fuss over someone typing you, when you most likely asked them to, then your just being a Dick, Go read the damn shit, and type yourself, no one should know you better then yourself. period.
although, i will admit to being entertained by the dramatic circles on this forum.
Ariel: If only I could make him understand. I just don't see things the way he does. I just don't see how a world that makes such wonderful things could be bad.
<3 ENFp (IEE) <3
Bwahaha.
Oh, honey, you need some background.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
