hkkmr and others have suggested this type for me. It was the original typing I gave myself, and I think IP temperament makes sense. I dunno, just wondering...
hkkmr and others have suggested this type for me. It was the original typing I gave myself, and I think IP temperament makes sense. I dunno, just wondering...
And I would hide my face in you and you would hide your face in me, and nobody would ever see us any more.
Probably. I vaguely assumed it was your type before I saw your self-typing.
The end is nigh
i don't find it hard to take seriously but it's not my first choice. you already know which is.
How about we go the full LSI and call it a potential deal with the commoners.
We had discussed the different types of intuition and how to distinguish Ne from Ni. The key thing to remember is Ne is all about how to notice things that could potentially change the present as it exists. Examples would be me thinking "What if I rode by bike to work rather than drive a car?"
Ni exercises more hypothetical questions and often depicts alternate realities such as a world where gravity did not exist. Hope this information is useless.
Ni is more about how the consillience of events imply alternate realities. It is an etheral vision of the future and past. It is the imaginative function that fills in the gaps of our knowledge to create a picture of what could be - and feels more like a daydream than speculation.
Socionics -
the16types.info
Hmm, well, based on this alone, would make sense for me. One of my favorite things to do is talk to people about "alternate realities"..like if sharks lived in the sky, or things along those lines.
Hmmm...I think I follow, though I'm not certain.
And I would hide my face in you and you would hide your face in me, and nobody would ever see us any more.
who the fuck are you
“I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in — and the West in general — into an unbearable hell and a choking life. - Osama bin Laden
fen i don't see iei at all. what jumps out at me a lot about you is you're very open about your feelings in a "tell, not show" kind of way that screams fi to me. I also see delta nf but thats harder to explain. like a commitment to being open and trying very hard not to jump to conclusions and the way you do it is very delta nf-ey to me. not iei, not see. just not seeing those at all. I've been liking fi-iee.
and yeah she's very nice (:
Upon reading this again, I think I typically do go the Ne route with that. I had a pretty busy day yesterday and that's all I did all day. "What if I arrive early to my interview? What do I do in the meantime if I am so I don't loiter around all awkward?" Then after my interview walking home: "Oh, Ben will be done with his test soon and I have time for lunch...maybe I should see if he wants to get lunch since I have an hour" "I need to get to my doctor's appointment. If I walk I need to leave soon. If my roommate can actually drop me off, I can relax for a bit." After the appointment: "If I walk home I can stop by Barberitos to finally eat (seeing as Ben was too busy earlier)." I guess when I know I have somewhere to go, I think about the different ways I can get there..and what each way means in terms of what I can do after I do what I need to do. This makes me seem really planningish. But I don't really...plan. It's more...consider the different opportunities and ways I can do things before they happen, but when that time comes to make that decision of which way I'm going to do things, I might even choose the one that makes less sense. I guess it kinda makes me think of walking on a path where there is a random garden thing that the path wraps around. As I approach it (if I notice it) I don't really plan which side around it I'm going to go, I just consider both sides as existing...perhaps consider the pros and cons (extremely insignificant ones in this case), and take whichever I feel like in the end. I often find I go around on the left when i finally approach the obstacle, even if I premeditiated I would go on the right..for some reason. This was a giant paragraph of...nothing. I'm sorry. Hehe.
Hehe, I've seen him around. I thought he was your brother?
Aw, Kassie. You seem to know how to explain me better than I do! I suppose the biggest reasons I'm considering IEI again...is...that hkkmr and glam both see IEI. IEI was my initial typing for myself as well. But...mostly...EP temperament seems iffy to me...perhaps not. I dunno. And whether I favor Fe or Fi...I still question that a lot. So..I don't know. Like, for example...I've been hanging out with Daniel (potential SEE?) a bit lately, and in affairs of feeling and all, he is much more vocal than me. He's always telling me how he feels about me..and he's really gushy. Maybe he's not SEE. I don't know.
Uni as in Uniden?
And I would hide my face in you and you would hide your face in me, and nobody would ever see us any more.
I feel a "What the hell is " shitstorm coming on. HA! get it? probably not.
"We have no compassion and we ask no compassion from you. When our turn comes, we shall not make excuses for the terror.".
Nah, either way I think or is my dominant function...which supposedly a person is less aware of, in a way. Right now I'm mostly trying to figure out my creative function in order to determine my dominant one..if that makes sense. I'm not too concerned with and right now...just and ...because if I figure that out, the perceiving function will fall into place.
Hopefully this won't develop into what you are talking about RedVillian..I've seen way too many threads where people are trying to explain to no end.. :/
But...I suppose....I am probably a serious type. I guess IEE fits. I just...need to meet some deltas around here...and see how that goes. I wonder where to find them..
And I would hide my face in you and you would hide your face in me, and nobody would ever see us any more.
Just because both are intuitive IE's doesn't mean that the difference in attitude renders them at all similar. Put a dom next to a dom and not only will you see the difference but so will they, even if they haven't the slightest conception of socionics. I also find that assuming your self-discovery of the creative function will make the dominant function fall into place is pretty dumb.
Please, take solace in the fact that many go their entire lives without discovering their type and many more go mad in the process.
"We have no compassion and we ask no compassion from you. When our turn comes, we shall not make excuses for the terror.".
Oh, I'm not saying an IEE is similar to an EIE..or anything of the sort. I'm just saying..considering I'm a XP temperament feeling type, and I'm having a harder time figuring out vs , I figure I should focus on the creative function, since it is more visible. The thing is..that really puzzles me...is probably abour 4-5 years ago, I was very much "IEI"-ish..but..now...I don't know. I suppose since people I've met in real life from the forum typed me IEI, it seemed more significant..than how I portray myself here.
I've already gone mad.
And I would hide my face in you and you would hide your face in me, and nobody would ever see us any more.
@fenryrr
The problem with trying to figure out your type based on figuring out your creative is that for
NeFi, Fe is still demonstrated via behaviors, and for
NiFe, Fi is still demonstrated via behaviors.
So if you're looking at the kinds of behaviors you do, you can easily confuse yourself.
If your looking at which info you consciously attend to, you're still at risk of confusing yourself, because the demonstrative function is as strong as the base function, influences the base function, and thus can be a bit difficult to determine if it's mental or vital.
As for the base functions of each, each type has issues with the other's base element. Ni base types usually consider Ne types to be wasting time/energy and/or deliberately avoiding making/stating their 'real' decision/judgment. 'Ne is choosing to be this way.' While Ne base types usually get frustrated that the Ni types are jumping to conclusions based off too little information. (at least in terms of NeFi and NiFe)
If you really wanted to figure out your type 'based on your creative', then you'd do best if you take in what the creative elements actually mean. By this i mean that
Fi creative also means Te HA, Ti polr, Fe demonstrative
Fe creative also means Ti HA, Te polr, Fi demonstrative
Since the polr and HA are worlds apart in terms of preference, you'd have an easier time figuring out your creative element if you first figured out your polr vs HA.
(The other option is to consider if
Mental statics with vital dynamcs fits better/worse than mental dynamics with vital statics, or vice versa. But that can be just as confusing for some.)
IEE 649 sx/sp cp
I am fairly certain I once made you cry in tinychat.
I would not choose IEI for you.
I get off cam when I cry. But I don't remember talking to you on tinychat. O.o
And I would hide my face in you and you would hide your face in me, and nobody would ever see us any more.
I don't see you as a beta, really...
After meeting Fen she immediately came off as IEI, she has this way about her that is expressive but adaptive. Even in this thread, I think she takes a conciliatory role, adapting to the people she interacts with but unable to come to a conclusion.
It's possible she's IEE, but I don't really see it althrough my time with her was limited. I think she is definitely receptive to someone that is forceful and opinionated who could help her come to an understanding.
I would say the people she reminds me the most of are Glam/Starfall/esper.