The Gamma description fits me best.
I've slept with Betas and Deltas, and those descriptions seem to fit them best, too. Although my sample size is very limited.
The Gamma description fits me best.
I've slept with Betas and Deltas, and those descriptions seem to fit them best, too. Although my sample size is very limited.
My sexual preferences sound most like Beta.
I don't think that this is a reliable way to type people, though, however interesting it may be.
Since I am the first wave hybrid ILI-Fe I have to choose gamma it seems with my beta roots of course.
*it is actually titled "Sadeness" but the typo was a nice touch.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
IEI with higher than average IQ what allows better using of weak functions and accented on superego block what is linked with worse emotions + probably temporaly supressed external emotionality because of meds/depressive state.
You are emotional, sentimental, with good F region skills, - F type. While the quality of T region looks worse.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Girls are for emotions. Men are for thinking.
You may think that as the complement about your femininity in the form of rough truth from your "charming" conflictor.
> Makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside.
yeah, the anger improves the blood flood
> No worries I have not changed my type, I just changed the presentation of my "type".
I was affraid you've changed the opinion about your type as the result of some meditation went wrongly.
So you want people trusted more to your dark T side with archaistic thinking straight from your unconscious. Meanwhile were more fascinated by your strong, but unexpected, emotional cuteness. The crafty plan!
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
There are high IQ individuals who never even try to show . You'll catch them with a test...
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Given the choices it's difficult to say.
You see, men are aroused by sight, and women by touch. So I want to see something good and yes I want to touch it, soft touches (alpha) but intenser touches too (beta).
Looks like I need to order an IEE to bust Sol's ass.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Hmmm all of them really. Just depends on my mood.
The Gamma sexual style as suggested in this thread doesn't entirely appeal to me, even though I am almost certainly from that Quadra.
For example, I prefer raw, rough, almost bestial sex as if dining on a piece of meat (or being dined on myself). I am a switch, not a dominant or a submissive and whether I prefer to be on top or not depends on my mood and energy levels. The dynamic I feel most comfortable in is most like a predator capturing his prey, except that these roles are not fixed in stone and will change often.
When I feel more energetic, I like to forcefully take a woman from behind, pull her hair, spank, lick and choke her. In a more placid state, I like to be embraced tightly, pinned down, kissed hard, and squeezed. Sex is primarily about two things to me: firstly, pure physical energy, and that means unleashing everything I have upon someone else. I expect them to love that passion, absorb it and throw even more force back upon me. Secondly, sex is about being able to show some sincere vulnerability and thus create an authentic emotional connection with someone else. I strongly disapprove of people who take sex partners they don't intend to form a relationship with, as that shows you are too weak and indecisive to make a decision and commit.
The profundity of this lovemaking does tend to mean (as implied by OP) that there will be relentless sex marathons followed by periods of inactivity and separation. You get burnt out otherwise. I won't speak for anyone else here, but though I switch from being conquered to conquering and back again frequently, I tend not to be particularly "acrobatic" or improvisational. I am open to trying new sex positions, but I don't like roleplay, dressing up or being called names other than my real name. I also won't use chains, ropes, whips, toys or allow them to be used on me. Pain, whether emotional or physical, is humiliating to experience and abusive to inflict.
Last edited by Spermatozoa; 11-21-2017 at 12:02 AM.
Okay more on gamma lol xDDD damn..I'm such a gamma
But I'm really sigma
ideal sex:
aggressive
loud
primal
passionate
intimate
emotional
dirty
rough
raw
power struggle
LSI-Se 836 Sp/Sx
I don’t believe any person in the world is only one of these consistently throughout their life or even day. What I want depends on my mood and the person who I’m doing it with. This is why socionics is so dumb.
It's about average. There is some truth. And some dumb part is very possible, as it's all gotten without experimental proof.
Most dumb is from how Socionics is used.
> depends on my mood and the person who I’m doing it with
and the "person" has type. that was about people of same quadra
"acrobatic behavior"
Sol can be pleased that if I really had to choose it would be be beta. It sounds most normal, really.
Alpha sounds nice too.
Gamma sounds hot sometimes but I don't usually wanna have to think hard enough about what I'm doing to contort myself into some upside down splits position to be impressive.
Delta isn't real. People don't tickle and wriggle sexually. Fake.
I will have to collect more data to be certain. #Hoe
clearly alpha description is superior, beta too. Delta sux.
Beta all the way. Unfortunately the delta tickling and pinching is true.
Alpha, but I’m not sure the descriptions of other quadras’ preferences are good.
It was only after I began to have sex that I realized what I liked. Namely,
Ew. I don't like being squeezed or squeezing others. Sounds more scary/weird than erotic.
I like colorful dramatic feelings when I'm 'dating' or as part of the regular social atmosphere in a group but for actual sex- no way. Nothing would make my dick softer really, probably. Call me old fashioned but males should express their feelings thru grunts & nose snorts or something not being colorful or dramatic (when in bed) Also I can't even begin to describe what a huge turn off it is for especially a man to just talk and talk about something with no action to back it up.
"Strong embraces" not really either- I'm pretty sure it's not erotic to literally just like beat people up and call it sex, if that's what you mean. Takes the 'victim' thing in a way I don't like. Idk what that means though as it's so vague.
'Intense effect on skin' sounds more closer to the truth- the only one I kinda half-way like but you'd have to be more specific. <evil pervy grin>
I like when people are willing to try interesting, creative things and are just really animalistic with it - w/o going 'too far'. (I'm open minded about some stuff as fantasy only though) I don't like humanizing/moralizing or pretending you are better than people, like trying to be too pc and 'nicey nice' about sex makes me vomit and kills the mood, but cruelty doesn't turn me on either. Unless it's make believe cruelty or something idk.
I would assume that people who come up with this crap are aristocratic. Is that fair?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phrenology
An optimist - does not get discouraged under any circumstances. Life upheavals and stressful events only toughen him and make more confident. He likes to laugh and entertain people. Enters contact with someone by involving him with a humorous remark. His humor is often sly and contain hints and double meanings. Easily enters into arguments and bets, especially if he is challenged. When arguing his points is often ironic, ridicules the views of his opponent. His irritability and hot temper may be unpleasant to others. However, he himself is not perceptive of this and believes that he is simply exchanging opinions.
http://www.wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=LIE_Profile_by_Gulenko
Mostly Alpha and some Delta. Miss me with that rough Se shit lol
Only have experience with Beta though.
>Intense effect on the partner’s skin
>Colorful dramatic feelings
No joke man. Beta women are so fucked up... They claw and bite you like animals. And they do fake moans like we're filming a porno lol