Might as well

[fairylights]

So you make plans that you don't want to implement but you're still action oriented? How?

[momental]

So you make plans that you don't want to implement but you're still action oriented? How?

It's more of making the plans and then determining after a certain amount of creation to select the appropriate one to act upon. The quicker between the creation and action taken the better . Not all plans are created equal.

[momental]

So, I have effectively killed off all input. LIE it is.

[fairylights]

So do you want more input or not?

Anyway, I found @Traveler's questions helpful in my thread, so here they are with a couple of additions of my own.

1. What kind of lifestyle do you have?
2. Do you enjoy debating and what kind of topics do you prefer to discuss?
3. How would you describe your overall behavior around others?
4. What do you like about the people you like and dislike about the people you dislike?

[momental]

So do you want more input or not?

Anyway, I found @Traveler's questions helpful in my thread, so here they are with a couple of additions of my own.

1. What kind of lifestyle do you have?
2. Do you enjoy debating and what kind of topics do you prefer to discuss?
3. How would you describe your overall behavior around others?
4. What do you like about the people you like and dislike about the people you dislike?

Number one. Lifestyle..... My lifestyle tends to be a little slower paced than most. I work and go to school and enjoy the company of only a few people. Most of my time alone, though not much, is spent in quiet reflection figuring out what I need to be in order to succeed in whatever I may attempt.

The second... I do enjoy debating. What do I enjoy debating? Everything.

Thirdly, I'd say that I would promote an atmosphere of debate where people can speak, be criticized and learn in a way that does not destroy their pride. Therefore my overall behavior is accepting of an idea, but critical in its analyzation.

Finally. People are full of information and ideas and I can extract from them this information, but they get in the way......

Perhaps these answers helped? Input is always welcome.

[Absurd]

So, I have effectively killed off all input. LIE it is.

Go with LIE. Gamma needs numbers for what it going to hit them.

[FDG]

Almost surely extraverte logical intuitive type. LIE more likely than ILE.

[Absurd]

Almost surely extraverte logical intuitive type. LIE more likely than ILE.

I'm the best.

[fen]

Se/Ni > Ne/Si it seems. I think LIE could make sense.

[Beautiful sky]

Let me define it for you some more so that you get it:

If I hold up a book and say, "this is a book."

Is that a fact or an evaluation?

[Beautiful sky]

You have to interpret everything; you can't let things mean what they are; it's as if you're uncomfortable with that; either accept it or SHUT UP.

[anndelise]

You have to interpret everything; you can't let things mean what they are; it's as if you're uncomfortable with that; either accept it or SHUT UP.

If a person is attempting to understand another person, an idea, a communication...then they have no choice BUT to interpret.
'things' have no meaning outside of what we give them.
Period!

[anndelise]

Concrete knowledge derived from external concrete source like a dictionary arouses me. That's a fact by me, my terms, what arouses Maritsa...get that?

I don,t care what arouses you.
But thank you for making my point. The meaning isn,t an objective fact...the meaning comes from your evaluations of it.

[Beautiful sky]

It's more of making the plans and then determining after a certain amount of creation to select the appropriate one to act upon. The quicker between the creation and action taken the better . Not all plans are created equal.

Judging which external action to take,
Determining which one is most appropriate poLR, something I'm good at.

You can reread the LSE/EII dual description for that last part.

I know. I am going to try one last time to explain what I am saying, in an attempt to believe that I have been misspeaking. I am not denying the fact that introversion removes the object from its external space and collects what it believes to be most important. I am saying that introspection does not inherently mean introvert, it means introverted function. I prefer action in the outside world meaning even though I enjoy introspecting I do not do so in my surrounding environment until I have acquired enough static information. This meaning I have in the very least Xe-Xi as an order.

When you're not dualized and are unfamiliar with how EII think, we think in possibilities of consideration, you may get confused and think we're not listening to you when we're actually trying to offer up other perspectives and see if those perspectives may lend interesting and NEW information. You may go back and reread why you got so short tempered, and frustrated with me, here.